Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Sometimes the railroad is at fault
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by mudchicken</i> <br /><br />fuzzball: <br /> <br />If there should have been gates, sue the state PUC and county for failure to fund installation. The gates are there to protect the railroad from idiot motorists as much as the other way around...(Hint: There is no money in that, so the lawyers are not inclined to try that tactic...) <br /> <br />starched feathers <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />MC- <br /> <br />Yeah, I wi***here was a way of pressuring the government entities (local, state and Feds) to actually put up enough money to fund all of the necessary crossing improvements. Unfortunately, most of those funds are alotted on the basis of body count rather than as a way to prevent future collisions. Of course, the government has immunity from lawsuits (which can be waived, although it seldom is in any meaningful way) so you won't get damages from them. The best you can do in most cases is force them to spend money through an injunction or other court order. <br /> <br />LC
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy