Trains.com

The Lucin Cufoff across the Great Salt Lake

10021 views
48 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:34 PM

MidlandMike

Paul, I also thought of concrete, but then I also thought of the steel reinforcing, and figured it would quickly corrode in the hypersaline environment.  Can this be avoided, or would they just have to figure on planned replacement?

Living here in the north woods, I know what salt does to concrete - never mind the re-rod...

I suspect that about the only materials that would do well for such a structure are wood (which was used) and bulk fill (as is now in place.)

Unless someone can come up with some form of composite or plastic piling, what they've got is probably as good as it gets.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Friday, August 12, 2016 9:06 PM

Modern concrete can be very strong - 4,000 to 5,000 psi is easy to achieve - and very dense/ impervious.  "High-range water reducers" can be used to minimize the water needed in the mix but still leave it fluid enough to be workable.  With the excess water gone, there are less voids left in the concrete when that water has evaporated, so it is more impermeable to salt water intrusion. 

Rebar can be protected from salt corrosion and rusting-caused expansion (which cracks the concrete) by using the green-coated epoxy common in northern states. 

The concrete piling can also be made thicker ==> more strength and more protection for the rebar.

The worst loading condition for the piles is when they're being driven.  After that they might be supported and protected by the fill around them. 

Keep in mind that a concrete column with a horizontal cross-section the size of letter-size paper - 8-1/2" x 11" = 93.5 sq. in. - can support a full-size railcar's worth of weight.  Using concrete with allowable stress of 3,000 psi (moderate) x 93.5 sq. in. = 280,000 lbs., cf. 285K max. gross weight for most modern cars. A single 12" diam. piling would have to be only 2.5" thick to have that much area; even just a handful across the ballast section could support maybe 5 - 10 carloads.

Lots of concrete piling is used in saline / brackish shore areas, and holds up fairly well. 

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Friday, August 12, 2016 9:15 PM

mudchicken
It has never stopped sinking, inspite of the late 1980's reconstruction by SP and MKCo. (all they managed to do was get rid of the soldier piling and old boxcars)....Still blows out at the base of the fill and the crappy lake bottom soils can't hold bearing, so the slump and rotational fail at the base of the embankment fill continues, albeit slowly.

What's old is new once more.

"The Bear vs. the Lake - rising lake level and SP's Lucin Cutoff" by Steinheimer, Richard, from Trains, April 1987, pg. 24& etc. 

( [Magazine Index 'keywords":] cutoff  lake  Lucin  salt  sp  Utah )

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 237 posts
Posted by JEREMY CENTANNI on Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:21 PM

Union Pacific: Volume 2 by Maury Klein has a much better detailed acount of the Salt Lake causeway and projects related to it than the book by Keenan.

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 1,243 posts
Posted by Sunnyland on Saturday, August 20, 2016 3:49 PM

I rode across this causeway two times, once with parents in 1959 on SP section of City of St. Louis, it was the wooden trestle at that time, because someone asked the conductor and he said yes.  It had a different sound and seemed strange to look out coach windows and see water on both sides. The other time was 1965 and sounds like it would have been the rock fill by that time. I know it had a different sound,  not hollow like the wooden one had been. Very interesting comments & articles. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Monday, August 22, 2016 10:30 AM

Islam section crew on Shriners' train to Ogden

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAIIsSbmFp8

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, August 22, 2016 12:44 PM

wanswheel
Islam section crew on Shriners' train to Ogden

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAIIsSbmFp8

The segment crossing the Salt Lake trestle would indicate a speed of about 25 MPH - not 'line' speed but not that slow.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Friday, August 26, 2016 12:55 PM

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: US
  • 62 posts
Posted by cudjoebob on Sunday, October 2, 2016 12:49 AM

to 'wanswheel'....fascinating, educational, and very interesting film!  Thanks for posting!  In context of the times, the St. Lawrence Seaway project was being built at the same time.  Glad the eco nuts weren't around at that time.  Neither project would have been built.  

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Sunday, October 2, 2016 5:40 AM

cudjoebob

to 'wanswheel'....fascinating, educational, and very interesting film!  Thanks for posting!  In context of the times, the St. Lawrence Seaway project was being built at the same time.  Glad the eco nuts weren't around at that time.  Neither project would have been built.  

 

Given the number of invasive species that have been brought into the Great Lakes since the seaway opened, and the damage they have caused, people are not sure that was a good idea.

Norm


  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 44 posts
Posted by The Ferro Kid on Sunday, October 2, 2016 8:01 AM

Norm48327

 

 
cudjoebob

to 'wanswheel'....fascinating, educational, and very interesting film!  Thanks for posting!  In context of the times, the St. Lawrence Seaway project was being built at the same time.  Glad the eco nuts weren't around at that time.  Neither project would have been built.  

 

 

 

Given the number of invasive species that have been brought into the Great Lakes since the seaway opened, and the damage they have caused, people are not sure that was a good idea.

That certainly, and also killed the Buffalo grain milling and storage industry and innumerable New York Central and other railroad carloadings to eastern ports.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: San Francisco East Bay
  • 1,360 posts
Posted by MikeF90 on Monday, October 3, 2016 1:10 AM

Thought I had posted this link before, but was mistaken. Quite an interesting article:

http://www.sltrib.com/home/4392697-155/union-pacific-agrees-to-delay-breach 

A replacement structure for the older crushed culverts has been built, but opening the connection between the two halves of the lake has been deferred until higher water levels are available (hopefully in a few months).

NOTE to @CMStPnP, suggest fixing the title spelling.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: San Francisco East Bay
  • 1,360 posts
Posted by MikeF90 on Thursday, December 15, 2016 3:51 PM

UP has reported that the new control berm between the two halves of the lake was breached on December 1. Not much detail in the short video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhRV8QBUUY0

Equalization between the levels of the lake arms should be complete sometime in January.

  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 44 posts
Posted by The Ferro Kid on Friday, December 16, 2016 1:17 PM

Fascinating!  If you go to the youtube URL cited above and page down, there's also another somewhat longer video of the breach.

 

 

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Saturday, December 17, 2016 5:37 AM

 

 

Construction of Causeway, G S Lake.

As Above.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp4qebb16cw

And opening Gap, longer version, as Above Post.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFu1D6r1uEA

Thank You.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • 217 posts
Posted by AnthonyV on Saturday, December 17, 2016 7:00 AM

NDG

 

 

Construction of Causeway, G S Lake.

As Above.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp4qebb16cw

And opening Gap, longer version, as Above Post.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFu1D6r1uEA

Thank You.

 

Great film - thanks for posting.

At the end it was stated the project cost $50 million ($414 million in 2015 dollars according to inflationdata.com).  I know nothing about what such a project should cost but it is surprisingly low to me, even for the late 1950s.

I wonder what the payback period was.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, December 17, 2016 8:51 AM

AnthonyV
NDG
 
Construction of Causeway, G S Lake.


As Above.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp4qebb16cw

And opening Gap, longer version, as Above Post.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFu1D6r1uEA

Thank You.

Great film - thanks for posting.

At the end it was stated the project cost $50 million ($414 million in 2015 dollars according to inflationdata.com).  I know nothing about what such a project should cost but it is surprisingly low to me, even for the late 1950s.

I wonder what the payback period was.

Don't think I would have wanted to be the operator of either of the diggers on either side of the opening - moving water can move the ground you are sitting on before you can vacate the area.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2014
  • 44 posts
Posted by The Ferro Kid on Sunday, April 2, 2017 1:33 PM

Interesting update on the subject:

 

CURRENT MARINA NEWS

Marina News

Great Salt Lake State Marina

March 11, 2017

2017 - What Awaits Us?

What a winter!  Snow, snow, snow!  Today we are at 165% snowpack.  That is an incredible recovery.  Yet March looks drier and warmer than normal.  That means a lot of spring runoff heading Great Salt Lake way.  The lake has already risen nearly as much as it does for the whole season.  And we will continue to rise.  It is very likely we will have enough water this spring to get all the boats back in the water and keep them in all year.  Let us hope we keep this wet cycle up for at least a few years.

DREDGING

DREDGING IS ON!  Equipment has begun to arrive and dock fingers are being removed in the areas to be dredged.  Dredging should begin late March and last about three or four months.

Railroad Causeway Breach

Union Pacific opened up the new breach on December 1st.  There are two different groups that created models to estimate what this would mean to lake levels on the two halves.  USGS estimated 1 to 1.5 foot loss to the south half with nearly a 3 foot rise in the north half in three to five weeks.  Another group estimated a loss of only 1 to 1.2 feet over a three month period.  But Mother Nature had other plans and delivered desperately needed moisture at the same time the south half was losing water to the north half.  Instead of losing over a foot the south half only lost 0.2 feet before coming back up 0.2 feet by the end of January.  And the two halves are in relative "equilibrium."  The two halves never balance out.  They always remain 1/2 of a foot difference in the winter to about 1 foot difference in the summer.  We are about 1 foot difference as of March 11.

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Sunday, April 2, 2017 2:28 PM

 

This from 1937 might be appropriate here??

http://wondersofworldengineering.com/great-salt-lake.html

Amazing rerouting!

The old line over Promontory was something else!  Was there in a snowstorm in April.

Did they have to bring in water for locomotives on the old route?, as it is quite steep up to there and looked very arid.??

Thank You.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy