Trains.com

Railroad runaway ramps

5066 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 1,855 posts
Railroad runaway ramps
Posted by angelob6660 on Saturday, October 3, 2015 1:30 AM

I was poundering if railroads had runaway ramps, lengthen to a mile long. If they lose control going down hill in mountainous terrain with helpers attached or not. Like on highways when truckers lose control of their truck. It has that little hump to slow it down.

Modeling the G.N.O. Railway, The Diamond Route.

Amtrak America, 1971-Present.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 707 posts
Posted by tdmidget on Saturday, October 3, 2015 1:35 AM

Have you tried searching for this? Maybe without the word "ramp" since that would only possibly apply to old time piggyback usage? Try "runaway" or some such. Or did you just want to post?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Saturday, October 3, 2015 2:48 AM

There was an article on in Trains magazine many years ago.  On a steep downhill grade, there was a switch to a spur that sloped uphill from the main.  The sole purpose of the spur was to safely stop runaway trains.  It was manned by a  signalman whose job was to set the switch to the spur ahead of any runaways.  The loco engineer would signal a runaway by blowing the whistle. I don't remember the location.

Found this from Google search for steepest railroad grade:  The Saulda Grade in North Carolina at one time had two runaway tracks. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saluda_Grade

 

Search for "runaway tracks" found:

Railway Review Vol 58 - Feb 12, 1916 has an article about a collision at Rockridge Tenn.  The collision was not a runnaway, but there was a runaway track at that location.

https://books.google.com/books?id=USo-AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA232&lpg=PA232&dq=railroad+%22runaway+track%22&source=bl&ots=MEJqXSH5Xe&sig=dbFeyxl01NpsXCnV4szmiCM1ULY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAmoVChMI58vInO6lyAIVRdOACh2cYgPA#v=onepage&q=railroad%20%22runaway%20track%22&f=false

Railway Preservation News Forum - Runaway Safety Tracks

http://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38140

 

 

 

 

 

 

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Saturday, October 3, 2015 7:16 AM

I wonder if the OP is using the European term for what Americans typically call 'grade' or 'hill'.  As noted, many railroads had runaway tracks, Saluda's being particularly well-documented both in arrangement and operation.

A problem is that many of the methods used on 'runaway truck roads' (humps of gravel, etc.) won't work effectively on runaway trains.  Wheels have to remain supported on rails and guided by flanges to avoid a pileup and hence there is a limitation both due to adhesion and presumable brake fade or failure.  Likewise you would not want sharp or heavy retardation of the leading cars with a trailing load.  I have to wonder if, in many cases, the track is intended as aform of 'triage', arranging to cause a more-or-less-catastrophic stoppage of the train, but away from the main line proper.

I wonder if a method like sequential spring retarders would produce adequate braking, at an appropriate rate, to be useful on a runaway track.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Saturday, October 3, 2015 7:35 AM

If they were to use retarders, would they need a separate track? What problems would unengaged retarders cause to a regular mainline track vs the cost and problems having a second track for the retarders? At the very least a separate track needs land, and a switch, and trains do sometimes split switches.

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Saturday, October 3, 2015 8:10 AM

Once again the scope is totally underestimated.

Retarders are designed to slow a car or two from less than 10 mph down to maybe stop.  they are not designed to stop a train moving 60 mph.  At 6 mph on a single car, you can put fairly substantial clamping force on the wheels.  With a 5000 ton train moving 60 mph, if you clamp the wheels on the lead cars the following cars will just shove them off their trucks (just like when a car derails, the trucks dig in and stop, and the car comes off the trucks).

Most runaway tracks are designed to divert a train away from the main and then pile it up away from the main or to stop a couple cars that rollout of an industry (way more common than a runaway train.) On a major railroad, trains run away maybe once every 5-10 years.  Cars roll away maybe three or four times a year.

You would need a couple miles of track to stop a train (assuming you could control it).  If you are going to build a slope up, then you would need a slope roughly equivalent of the slope down.

By the way, if you have a slope up, once you stop the train, how do you keep it on the slope up (its a runaway because the brakes aren't working or can't hold the train.)  The train would roll back out of the sloped track the other way and continue see-sawing until it stopped in the low spot.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, October 3, 2015 8:45 AM

On Saluda Hill, the switches at the runaway tracks (there were two, originally) were set to divert a train from the main, and the engineer of a train coming down the hill would give the switchtender a signal if he had his train under control so that the switchtender would line the switch(es) for the main.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, October 3, 2015 9:39 AM

tdmidget

Have you tried searching for this? Maybe without the word "ramp" since that would only possibly apply to old time piggyback usage? Try "runaway" or some such. Or did you just want to post?

 

 Awe come on now.  That's a little harsh.  It sounds like the work of a curious mind.  There's nothing wrong with that.  Besides, couldn't every question posed on these forums elicit the same answer?  Where would that get us?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Raleigh, N.C.
  • 182 posts
Posted by dubch87 on Saturday, October 3, 2015 10:06 AM

The whole video is worth watching, but skip to the 9 minute mark to see the section on the runaway tracks at Saluda.

   

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Saturday, October 3, 2015 11:47 AM

The definitive article on the Saluda Grade and its "safety tracks":

"Saluda - America's steepest mainline grade"
by Clodfelter, Frank - from Trains, November 1984, pg. 26 &etc.

Fortunately, it's available in "PDF" format here:

http://www.polkcounty.org/saludagrade/saluda%20grade.pdf 

From:

 http://www.polkcounty.org/saludagrade/the_saluda_grade.html 

http://www.historicsaluda.org/?page_id=448 

It was even used once or twice in the diesel era 1964 and 1971 - see:

"Selected railroad reading: The other side of Saluda - memories of Saluda Grade", by McCall, Charles C., from Trains, May 1981, pgs. 31 - 32.   
 

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 1,155 posts
Posted by tcwright973 on Saturday, October 3, 2015 2:10 PM

I agree with Murphy Siding, that last remark was totally uncalled for. It's not necessary to belittle anyone's questions.

Tom

Pittsburgh, PA

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, October 3, 2015 2:13 PM

Thanks, Paul, for the reference. I remembered reading the article, for I was quite interested in the grade, for I have long been intrigued by it.–but I did not remember that it was printed more than thirty years ago.

I have been down the grade twice, and up it once, always on a passenger train.

Johnny

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Saturday, October 3, 2015 4:36 PM

You're welcome, Johnny.

Any recollections you can share with us ?

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    July 2015
  • 52 posts
Posted by Goodtiming on Saturday, October 3, 2015 6:21 PM

My thoughts exactly; maybe a bad day. Thank the Lord, I have never had one - that I can remember!

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Sunday, October 4, 2015 12:36 AM

Danke!

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, October 4, 2015 9:42 AM

dubch87

The whole video is worth watching, but skip to the 9 minute mark to see the section on the runaway tracks at Saluda.

 

dubch87,

That is an excellent video in the way it explains all of the technicalities of taking heavy trains down such a steep grade.  The precision of the method is amazing.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:21 AM

Paul_D_North_Jr

You're welcome, Johnny.

Any recollections you can share with us ?

- Paul North. 

 

Paul, what I remember particularly from my first trip down (from Asheville to Hayne, in 1964) was sitting in an empty roomette, talking with the conductor and flagman--I do not remember which two of us shared the upholstered seat and which one sat on the non-upholstered seat. I had bouth a roundtrip ticket to Spartanburg, and when I told the conductor that I was going right back on #27, he told me to get off at Hayne--to make sure that I was not left in Spartanburg (27, 28, 33, and 34 were scheduled to be in Spartanburg at the same time, with enough time to make any connection). Going back up was different, for we met the weedkiller train as  it came down, spraying poisoned oil, at the last siding at the bottom. I do not remember just what the problem with our sanders was, but we had great trouble going up, taking more than an hour as I recall.

I also remember going in to Asheville that morning from Black Mountain--taking my first ride on the Asheville Special--I was attending a conference in Montreat (two miles north of Black Mountain), and my roommate drove me down to Black Mountain after I had told him I planned to walk down. 

My second trip down, from Knoxville to Columbia, in 1967, was also unspectacular. I knew, on both trips, that great care was to be taken before and during the descent.

 

Johnny

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, October 4, 2015 10:34 AM

NDG

C.1900 CPR had run away tracks West of the Divide where the switch was lined normal for the run away track.

There was an adjacent shanty for the switch tender who would line the switch thru for the Main for uphill trains ( Duh! ) and for downhill movements ONLY when he received a Whistle Signal from the Engineer that he had his train under control.

A sad thing about these forums are folks who always seem to have something nasty to say similar to Mr. Midget.

No, he is NOT alone.

Not quite the example one might want to present to younger folk who could be looking to the Elders for guidance and reassurance for advice?

We all know how dumb we were and felt on the first day on the job on the Rwy?

I trained a new-hire decades ago and said we can do this the Company Way, sit inside and read the Rules and Safety Booklets, OR we can go outside and look at the Railway itself.

I walked him to a Switch ( Turnout ) and showed him how a flanged wheel could cross the other rail at the Frog. He had wondered about that already. I then gave him my key and let him 'throw' the Switch, the correct place and how to stand and observe how the points moved in relation to the handle. A brief talk on targets and the position that the switch should be locked and left. Yard switches often had hooks.

I then took him down to a cut of cars and illustrated how a coupler knuckle worked with the operating lever and that one had to pull the knuckle open and sometimes move the whole drawbar over to line it up.

DO NOT BE COUPLED in here, no matter what!!

Safety First!!

A lesson on coupling air hoses, and angle cocks, with no pressure, just to see how, and how to stand over the rail.

Then a hand brake up high, as cars still had running boards on the roof, and the reason for the adjacent retainer.

There was a GP9 on hand for another train, and he learned the basics in motion of 'Running' a lite engine. He was impressed!

There was a Wye there, and we walked around the Wye and across the Mighty Kootenay River @ the West Wye Switch, just to kill time, discuss Jordan Rails and throw rocks. Lots of rocks, just to get it right!

We returned on the other leg, thus Wying ourselves, and really should have backed down one leg.

Anyway. Final 'lesson' was what was the nominal width in feet and inches between the inside of the rails ( Standard Gauge )?

Another fact salted away.

He had a good time, and so did I.

I said he could come back for a brush up on throwing rocks, any time.

He went far in the Company, now having 30+ years in, a White Hard Hat and a divorce with kids at home.

He was down for a funeral last week and we hugged and hugged and talked about his dog, buried in the back yard on the old homestead.

I wished we could go back and throw rocks some more.

Maybe someday??

Thank You.

 

 

NDG

C.1900 CPR had run away tracks West of the Divide where the switch was lined normal for the run away track.

There was an adjacent shanty for the switch tender who would line the switch thru for the Main for uphill trains ( Duh! ) and for downhill movements ONLY when he received a Whistle Signal from the Engineer that he had his train under control.

A sad thing about these forums are folks who always seem to have something nasty to say similar to Mr. Midget.

No, he is NOT alone.

Not quite the example one might want to present to younger folk who could be looking to the Elders for guidance and reassurance for advice?

We all know how dumb we were and felt on the first day on the job on the Rwy?

I trained a new-hire decades ago and said we can do this the Company Way, sit inside and read the Rules and Safety Booklets, OR we can go outside and look at the Railway itself.

I walked him to a Switch ( Turnout ) and showed him how a flanged wheel could cross the other rail at the Frog. He had wondered about that already. I then gave him my key and let him 'throw' the Switch, the correct place and how to stand and observe how the points moved in relation to the handle. A brief talk on targets and the position that the switch should be locked and left. Yard switches often had hooks.

I then took him down to a cut of cars and illustrated how a coupler knuckle worked with the operating lever and that one had to pull the knuckle open and sometimes move the whole drawbar over to line it up.

DO NOT BE COUPLED in here, no matter what!!

Safety First!!

A lesson on coupling air hoses, and angle cocks, with no pressure, just to see how, and how to stand over the rail.

Then a hand brake up high, as cars still had running boards on the roof, and the reason for the adjacent retainer.

There was a GP9 on hand for another train, and he learned the basics in motion of 'Running' a lite engine. He was impressed!

There was a Wye there, and we walked around the Wye and across the Mighty Kootenay River @ the West Wye Switch, just to kill time, discuss Jordan Rails and throw rocks. Lots of rocks, just to get it right!

We returned on the other leg, thus Wying ourselves, and really should have backed down one leg.

Anyway. Final 'lesson' was what was the nominal width in feet and inches between the inside of the rails ( Standard Gauge )?

Another fact salted away.

He had a good time, and so did I.

I said he could come back for a brush up on throwing rocks, any time.

He went far in the Company, now having 30+ years in, a White Hard Hat and a divorce with kids at home.

He was down for a funeral last week and we hugged and hugged and talked about his dog, buried in the back yard on the old homestead.

I wished we could go back and throw rocks some more.

Maybe someday??

Thank You.

 

 

Well said, NDG.

Your example of giving instruction is excellent. Back in my days of playing with the real thing, I had observed the various practices followed in switching and engine running before I applied my hand at such, and I was not faulted when I began--except in my practice of boarding a moving engine (I raised the wrong foot first). I did have to ask just which run to use when moving the engine around the wye (I knew that Run 1 did not move the engine).

As to suggesting how to learn, I was annoyed some time back when an occasional poster to these forums intimated that I was too lazy to look a certain matter up when we were exchanging posts on a certain topic.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, October 4, 2015 2:29 PM

In the video the reduction of the leading consist's dynamic brake around the tight curve was very revealing. never had thought about turning the outside rail turn over but does make sense.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy