Trains.com

Great Lakes Basin Railroad

8711 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Great Lakes Basin Railroad
Posted by Buslist on Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:06 PM

Just attended a seminar on the proposed Chicago Outer, Outer Belt -- the Great Lakes Basin Railroad. The 200+ mile project will extend from Michigan City to near Janesville. The price tag is estimated at $6+B, all privately financed.    https://utc.uic.edu/plans-for-great-lakes-basin-railroad-detailed-at-presentation-april-29/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:51 PM

The II&M / Chicago Milwaukee & Gary tried this once, back in 1904-78...

 

What's old is new again?

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:28 PM

mudchicken

The II&M / Chicago Milwaukee & Gary tried this once, back in 1904-78...

 

What's old is new again?

 

 

that was noted in the presentation and that phrase was used several times.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:10 PM

Buslist
 
mudchicken

The II&M / Chicago Milwaukee & Gary tried this once, back in 1904-78...

 

What's old is new again?

 

 

 

 

that was noted in the presentation and that phrase was used several times.

 

http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/159934.aspx 

[Kankakee Belt Route] FORUM Thread from 2009 

Supports the 'what's new is old' supposition! Whistling

 

 


 

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:46 PM

samfp1943

 

 
Buslist
 
mudchicken

The II&M / Chicago Milwaukee & Gary tried this once, back in 1904-78...

 

What's old is new again?

 

 

 

 

that was noted in the presentation and that phrase was used several times.

 

 

 

http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/159934.aspx 

[Kankakee Belt Route] FORUM Thread from 2009 

Supports the 'what's new is old' supposition! Whistling

 

Link doesn't work for me but I think this isn't some fan speculation but some high powered business folks backing this. But it still reminds me of the aT1 trust, some very deticated folks chasing an almost impossible goal.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, April 30, 2015 7:11 AM

I would think that this concept is dead on arrival for a variety of reasons.  First, where is the money going to come from?  Second, while the governors of the states involved are willing to jump through lots of hoops to look "pro-business", how do the businessmen involved plan on acquiring a right-of-way without being gouged and gain approval of environmental impact statements and other legal requirements?  Third, the booming overhead Chicago bypass traffic on EJ&E when it was a US Steel property shows how successful this concept can be.  Unless this road is a joint subsidiary of the Class 1 railroads, it isn't going to get a lot of overhead traffic.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:39 AM

Hmm.
Here's a slightly different discussion of this bypass.
Hmm

If it seems like Orfordville is in the middle of nowhere to start such a massive project, that's exactly the reason, Patton said. They don't want the railroad going through any population centers.
I've heard that phrase before in railroad history, usually on projects that didn't end well.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Thursday, April 30, 2015 11:16 AM

Just read a little about the proposal: Basically a brand New 5 Track rail corridor built IINM through primarily "Greenfield" property rather than existing R.O.W's?

It might make sense in terms of relieving congested freight lines in and around Chicago but I would imagine the NIMBY uproar will make the opposition to CN's attempts to increase traffic on the E,J & E look like an argument among the members of a book club..

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:52 PM

carnej1

Just read a little about the proposal: Basically a brand New 5 Track rail corridor built IINM through primarily "Greenfield" property rather than existing R.O.W's?

It might make sense in terms of relieving congested freight lines in and around Chicago but I would imagine the NIMBY uproar will make the opposition to CN's attempts to increase traffic on the E,J & E look like an argument among the members of a book club..

 

 

The plan is to be totally grade separated and avoid population centers minimizing NIMBY objections. There was a NIMBY type in the room yesterday that was worried about unemployment among truck drivers due to diverted traffic and bridge design over the 3 major river crossings (Rock, Illinois and Kankakee).

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, May 1, 2015 8:57 PM

Buslist

  

The plan is to be totally grade separated and avoid population centers minimizing NIMBY objections. There was a NIMBY type in the room yesterday that was worried about unemployment among truck drivers due to diverted traffic and bridge design over the 3 major river crossings (Rock, Illinois and Kankakee).

 

Illinois farmland is some of the most expensive in the country.  It is much more valuable than the deserted sagebrush ranchland in eastern Colorado that was to be crossed by a Joint line (Denver-Pueblo) bypass, but that bypass still died after rancher opposition (Although UP ambivalence also did not help).

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Saturday, May 2, 2015 6:34 PM

MidlandMike
 
Buslist

  

The plan is to be totally grade separated and avoid population centers minimizing NIMBY objections. There was a NIMBY type in the room yesterday that was worried about unemployment among truck drivers due to diverted traffic and bridge design over the 3 major river crossings (Rock, Illinois and Kankakee).

 

 

 

Illinois farmland is some of the most expensive in the country.  It is much more valuable than the deserted sagebrush ranchland in eastern Colorado that was to be crossed by a Joint line (Denver-Pueblo) bypass, but that bypass still died after rancher opposition (Although UP ambivalence also did not help).

 

The big fail was the fear mongering over condemnation/ Eminent Domain and a clueless organization that ought to go back to it's old name of Colorado Department of Highways. (completely inept in a railroad sense and have not learned from their multiple past flubs.) 

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: northern il.
  • 142 posts
Posted by rdettmer on Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:14 AM

is this for real or somebody's pipedream?

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Sunday, May 17, 2015 12:33 AM

rdettmer

is this for real or somebody's pipedream?

 

They claim to have the proposal before the STB by the end of the year so let's see if they get there. There are some high powered guys involved. I have no clue where the $ would come from, but they claim to have a good chunk of it.

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • 1 posts
Posted by Frank GLB Railroad on Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:17 AM

Buslist
 
rdettmer

is this for real or somebody's pipedream?

 

 

 

They claim to have the proposal before the STB by the end of the year so let's see if they get there. There are some high powered guys involved. I have no clue where the $ would come from, but they claim to have a good chunk of it.

 

Buslist
 
rdettmer

is this for real or somebody's pipedream?

 

 

 

They claim to have the proposal before the STB by the end of the year so let's see if they get there. There are some high powered guys involved. I have no clue where the $ would come from, but they claim to have a good chunk of it.

 

Great Lakes Basin Railroad Chicago Bypass

First STB Meeting September 2015..NOI(Notice of Intent) should be out Feb 2016

Public Meetings March 2016

http://www.greatlakesbasin.net

 

 

G

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Wednesday, April 20, 2016 9:16 PM

Article on this in today's Wall Street Journal, pages B-1 and B-2 or B-4.

I'd say long on hope and intent, short on money and commitments.

It did note that the STB has recently started public hearings/ comment sessions on it. 

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, April 20, 2016 9:39 PM

3 Filings and a Decision/Notice so far. (And a ton of BANANA NIMBYism already...)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,568 posts
Posted by CandOforprogress2 on Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:00 AM

The Illiana Expressway or Illinoise Indiana Bypass would have covered some of the same teritory as the Great Lakes Basin Railroad. See-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illiana_Expressway both in my opinion would have sucked jobs out of urban chicago hurting inner city blacks and hispanics who live in the inner ring and core burbs.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Saturday, May 28, 2016 6:04 PM

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, May 29, 2016 10:56 AM

What this might do is force the Class I's to put some money into getting more serious in imiplementing the portions of CREATE that are still to be done.   Including NS!   I would view that as a positive development indeed.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy