Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="edblysard"] <div> <ul> <li>In the largest perspective of the news, at least half the general public believes that the political philosophy of deregulation is wrong because it cuts corners in safety; and they believe that the MM&A wreck proves it.  Happy Labor Day.      </li> </ul> </div> Where did you get the figure of “at least half of the general population” and how in the world do you tie deregulation into anything to do with safety? Can you cite a source for both figures and the statement? Deregulation had nothing to do whatsoever with crew size, it dealt with the ability to set competitive prices.[/quote] Ed, Further developing my earlier reply to your comments about deregulation, here is an article that sums up the viewpoint of many Canadians regarding the MM&A wreck.  As I mentioned in my earlier reply this seems to be the view of about half of Canada.  I don’t have the numbers, but it strikes me as a very fundamental tug of war between the free market and regulation; and typically tugs of war end up with half on one side and half on the other side.  We are having the same tug of war in the U.S. (In my opinion).  Note that the issue of deregulation is being applied to crew size as well as many other issues, and not just referring to rate regulation.  In fact, I would say that this current blaming of deregulation in Canada has nothing to do with rates.  It is all about health and safety: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/maude-barlow/lac-megantic_b_3660794.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/maude-barlow/lac-megantic_b_3660794.html</a> From the article: A collision of water, oil, and transport deregulation in Lac-Mégantic How easy it would be to lay the blame for the tragedy in Lac-Mégantic on the engineer who ran the train. But the real responsibility lies with the governments on both sides of the border who have deregulated their transport sectors, gutted freshwater protections and promoted the spectacular growth and transport of new and unsustainable fossil fuels. Starting back in the 1970s, the US government deregulated rail transport, allowing deep staff reductions, the removal of brakemen from trains and lower safety standards for shipping hazardous materials. Canadian governments followed suit and allowed the railways to self-regulate safety standards and continue to ship oil in the older, accident-prone tanker cars of the kind that crashed into Lac-Mégantic. Just last year, Transport Canada gave Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railways the green light to run each train with just one engineer, which explains how one man came to be in charge of 72 cars and five locomotives carrying combustible energy through inhabited communities. The Harper government, meanwhile, has gutted environmental regulation and freshwater protection in order to speed up the development of the Alberta tar sands. Its victims include the Fisheries Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act and the whole environmental assessment process. Ninety-nine percent of all lakes and rivers in Canada, including Lac-Mégantic, are no longer protected from pipelines carrying bitumen or fracked oils near, around or under them.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag