schlimm Murphy Siding 382 miles in 220 minutes is 1.737 miles per minute, or 104.22 m.p.h. !That's 104.22 m.p.h. average, not taking into account acceleration, deceleration, and the speed of sound / air density factors Many trains (hourly, as I recall) run non-stop from Hamburg to the Berlin Spandau station: 178 miles in 90 minutes, 118 mph. No big deal on a modern system.
Murphy Siding 382 miles in 220 minutes is 1.737 miles per minute, or 104.22 m.p.h. !That's 104.22 m.p.h. average, not taking into account acceleration, deceleration, and the speed of sound / air density factors
Many trains (hourly, as I recall) run non-stop from Hamburg to the Berlin Spandau station: 178 miles in 90 minutes, 118 mph. No big deal on a modern system.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
Overmod Murphy Siding 382 miles in 220 minutes is 1.737 miles per minute, or 104.22 m.p.h. That's interesting. But have you noticed that, unless you are using some very unusual conversion factor, your "220 minutes" are not equal to the 5hr 28min to 5hr 44min that schlimm quoted? The lower time figure works out to just what I'd expect: call it 70mph within the bounds of rounding errors.
Murphy Siding 382 miles in 220 minutes is 1.737 miles per minute, or 104.22 m.p.h.
That's interesting. But have you noticed that, unless you are using some very unusual conversion factor, your "220 minutes" are not equal to the 5hr 28min to 5hr 44min that schlimm quoted?
The lower time figure works out to just what I'd expect: call it 70mph within the bounds of rounding errors.
Murphy SidingSorry I wasn't clearer. The 220 minutes was a reference to how fast schlimn had driven that route- 3 hours 55 minutes, less a 15 minute stop.
Sorry, I didn't see that until after you mentioned it. I was just assuming that 3 was a typo for 5.
I've been down the 15 from the end of 70 down to St. George averaging 114 mph (in a convoy of about 5 vehicles) but that involved some sustained running at decidedly 'statutory reckless driving' speed; not something most cars' limiters would permit. I suppose in the right car, with the right driving experience (which I presume schlimm would have) it could be done on the 5, if all you counted was the highway mileage and not the 'last miles' at either end. (And if your Valentine One was working properly...)
I'd like to hear the story of that run, though, if done that fast...
Murphy Siding Overmod Murphy Siding 382 miles in 220 minutes is 1.737 miles per minute, or 104.22 m.p.h. That's interesting. But have you noticed that, unless you are using some very unusual conversion factor, your "220 minutes" are not equal to the 5hr 28min to 5hr 44min that schlimm quoted? The lower time figure works out to just what I'd expect: call it 70mph within the bounds of rounding errors. Sorry I wasn't clearer. The 220 minutes was a reference to how fast schlimn had driven that route- 3 hours 55 minutes, less a 15 minute stop.
Sorry I wasn't clearer. The 220 minutes was a reference to how fast schlimn had driven that route- 3 hours 55 minutes, less a 15 minute stop.
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
The jury is still out on Elon Musk's electric cars but I have the feeling that the speculators (I wouldn't call them investors) who bought Tesla shares will live to regret it. Musk appears to have a blind acceptance of "gee-whiz" technology and its purported ability to advance society. He also appears to have a blind eye as to what this will cost and where the money will come from.
schlimm http://www.wired.com/2014/12/jumpstartfund-hyperloop-elon-musk/ As to the 382 mile drive, Google Map says the time would be 5 hr 28 min. to 5 hr 44. The speed limit varies, 65 - 70 mph. The only time I ever drove it, it took 3 hours, 55 minutes, including a 15 minute stop.
http://www.wired.com/2014/12/jumpstartfund-hyperloop-elon-musk/
As to the 382 mile drive, Google Map says the time would be 5 hr 28 min. to 5 hr 44. The speed limit varies, 65 - 70 mph. The only time I ever drove it, it took 3 hours, 55 minutes, including a 15 minute stop.
Obviously (to Overmod, at least) it was a typo, a 3 for a 5, given the context of the previous sentence giving Google times in the 5+ hour range.
schlimm Obviously (to Overmod, at least) it was a typo, a 3 for a 5, given the context of the previous sentence giving Google times in the 5+ hour range.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.