Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
SP Cab Forwards - an idea not that widely used[?]
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Some railroads did permit heavy steam power to push behind the caboose, though I wonder if anyone was foolish enough to actually ride in a wood caboose with a 2-8-8-2 hammering at the rear. In the diesel era, most railroads restricted the use of pushers behind cabooses, even though they were all-steel by that point -- D&RGW allowed two GP40s or one SD40T-2 or SD45 behind a caboose; anything more had to be cut in ahead of the caboose, or the excess units isolated. <br /> <br />I can't imagine that a cab-forward rode very well. Must have been pretty bouncy.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy