Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Do Railroad Managers Secretly Favor PTC?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p> </p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">There is another reason to conclude that the coupler mandate may not have been necessary to complete the conversion within seven years. By the time of the 1893 mandate, the 20% conversion was possibly sufficient to propel the industry forward to completion as quickly as possible. The reason this may have been the case was that the conversion phase required coupling MCB couplers to link and pin couplers, which caused more accidents and delays than the most dangerous period of the link and pin phase. So once they had a sufficient number of cars converted, this mating of the differing coupler types grew into a formidable problem, creating a strong incentive to get the conversion job done. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy