Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
One year later (sleep thread)
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Ed,</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I did not mean to suggest that I had concluded that the engineer missed the signal and collided with the leading train because he was asleep. As you and zugmann, I believe pointed out, he could have simply failed to see the standing train. Was he authorized to pass the red signal and stay at restricted speed? If so, the theory of sleeping past the red signal would not be needed to explain passing it. So that just leaves the standing train as the requirement for action. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">However, having said that, I don’t see how sleep could be ruled out by the timing of the final alerter and throttle resets. He could have been sleeping between alerter resets, and become accustomed to falling asleep in a very short time after each reset. If so, he could have reset the alerter; and seven seconds later, reset the throttle; and then slept for the next 1 minute 53 seconds until impact. All we know for sure is that he was awake during the final alerter reset and final throttle change. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy