Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
One year later (sleep thread)
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">In the report, I recall that the alerter was nearly at the end of its quiet interval, and was scheduled to sound something like 7 seconds after the time of impact. So the timing of the circumstance was relatively unfavorable by allowing almost the maximum quite cycle ahead of the point where the engineer’s action was called for. It is just a matter of chance, but a different position of the alerter cycle in relation to the crash might have prevented the crash. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">It will be interesting to see how much time transpired between the last alerter reset and the time of impact in the Goodwell, Oklahoma collision. One would expect a relatively long time interval. What would the NTSB conclude if the alterter was reset 5-10 seconds before impact? </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy