Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Railroad Reregulation ...and Some New Stuff As Well
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="jeffhergert"]</p> <p>[quote user="Bucyrus"]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"> So part of the mandate orders research and development, which by its very nature is impossible to deliver on a schedule, or deliver at a predicable cost. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;"> </span></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p>I think the mandate came about because enough people in the right positions believe that PTC is available right now, today and has been available for some time. That the only reason the railroads have not already adopted PTC is only because they don't want to spend the money.</p> <p>Since PTC in some form has been looked at since at least the 1980s and some vendors, railroads in other countries and transit systems have or claim to have PTC like capabilities, I can see where people could think this. Especially if the people's only knowledge comes from "experts" with an agenda or short media clips of said experts. It doesn't help when TV shows and movies purportedly set in current times show technologies that are still more sci-fi than reality. We've come along way, but sometimes not as far as we think.</p> <p>Jeff </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p> </p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">Jeff,</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I think you have perfectly described the situation.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">People with authority make a knee jerk decision with only a simplistic understanding of what they are mandating, egged on by a bunch of special interests who stand to gain by the mandate, and are doing their best to create the perception that PTC is a sure fire solution, ready to go. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">And in these days of fashionable, corporation hating, it is very easy to sell the idea that this public safety improvement is being held up only by the greed of the railroad companies who don’t want to spend money to save lives because it adds nothing to their bottom line.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I know how projects can get underestimated, and this could be a real humdinger. </span></p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy