Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Provocative PTC Article in Popular Science Magazine
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">It is easy to conclude that the PTC mandate was necessary because the railroads have not installed PTC voluntarily. However, they cannot implement something until after it has been developed, and the development of PTC is not yet complete. So there is no basis to conclude that the railroads have been remiss, negligent, or careless in not yet installing PTC.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The PTC mandate is more than just an order to install PTC. More significantly, it is a mandate to develop PTC, using the forced implementation on the operating railroads as a development laboratory, at the railroads’ cost. And as is the case of all research and development, the total cost has no known limit. And like all massive projects, the more you spend, the harder it is to back out of it. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">And also, like all massive projects, proponents lowball the initial estimates because they <i>know</i> that once the project moves forward, it becomes harder and harder to back out of it. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy