Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
rail mergers
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by wabash1</i> <br /><br />the main reason for bnsf wanting to team up with the ns is they have no trakage rights to the east coast. and hence the money would be greater ( more profit ) if they did. <br />[/quote] <br />why would bnsf prefer a matchup with ns? why do rumors abound matching up with csx? all four systems have chicago, st. louis and memphis as common points. bnsf could theoretically reach the east coast with either ns or csx, but bnsf/ns is the most discussed merger. why?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy