Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
A Big Change for Grade Crossings?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Murphy Siding"]The "extra, un-needed reliability" (!?!) Is there because of a fear of lawsuits. Who in their right mind would come out and say that they are removing some of the perceived "extra" reliability in the name of cost cutting?[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The proposal is to <strong><span style="text-decoration:underline;">REMOVE</span></strong> the liability, not to <strong><span style="text-decoration:underline;">TRANSFER</span></strong> it to somebody else. If you remove the liability, there will be no lawsuits. If there are no lawsuits, there will be no fear of lawsuits. If there is no fear of lawsuits, there will be no reason to build in more quality than needed. </span></p> <p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy