Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
A Big Change for Grade Crossings?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">The one essential component of the proposal is to remove all crossing liability from the railroads and give it to the public sector.</span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">I might have misinterpreted the report, but I assume that it proposes to take <span style="text-decoration:underline;">ALL</span> crossings out of the purview of the private railroads, and not just the newly signalized passive crossings. </span></p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;font-size:small;">If it is true that the railroads would jump at the chance to “opt out” of the grade crossing ownership and responsibility, then it seems to me that the only obstacle would be to change the liability so it can happen. It does not seem to me that the report is asking anything of the railroads. So I cannot see how they would be in any position to criticize it. </span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy