Trains.com

Truck firm faces paying millions in Amtrak crash

1589 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Truck firm faces paying millions in Amtrak crash
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:12 PM

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:29 PM

Say goodbye to John Davis Trucking.

Norm


  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,931 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 6:36 PM

Norm48327

Say goodbye to John Davis Trucking.

I fully expect John Davis Trucking is currently a name only entity with no resources.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,789 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:53 PM

Yes, very unlikely they will be able to continue operations after something like that. Sad really... people died and someone's life's work gone up in smoke. 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,159 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:18 PM

Ulrich

Yes, very unlikely they will be able to continue operations after something like that. Sad really... people died and someone's life's work gone up in smoke. 

In many cases like this, unless the trucking Company is in business on a very large scale; they will be gone very, shortly.    The only ones to be paid will be The Suits'...   The railroads, and their Insurance Carriers will divvy up the 'risks', and move on.    Remember the wreck of #59 in March of 1999 ?   Damages were something in the neighborhood of 6 to 7 million bucks, and 11 people were killed.. Trucker got two years for a log book violation... 


 

 


 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Thursday, September 18, 2014 3:43 AM
It really depends on if John Davis had catastrophic coverage. Usually catastrophic coverage will go to the value of the company for a firm that size. Ten million is not an unusual amount for a company that size.
The wrongful death part of the law suit has not gone to trial. That side has the potential for punitive damages. Much more expensive. That the judge is awarding UP considerable attorney fees makes me wonder if the judge was not happy with John Davis Trucking and or their attorneys.
Rgds IGN
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,824 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, September 19, 2014 5:16 PM

Don't remember its truck count but if ~ 80 at $50,000 per then value is  ~ $4.0M.  But no matter what happens either the company or anyone connected with the company will see a very large increase in insurance premiums for the company or another ?

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,789 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, September 19, 2014 6:04 PM

They may or may not. If John Davis Trucking had an otherwise  exemplary safety record  then they might have a shot at survival..

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Friday, September 19, 2014 6:23 PM

News reports have indicated their truck maintenance was less than adequate. Not sure of the veracity.

Norm


  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,789 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, September 19, 2014 6:50 PM

Then they're pretty much cooked. 

  • Member since
    November 2010
  • 17 posts
Posted by Proud Infidel on Saturday, September 20, 2014 10:55 AM

On average, another Trucking Company goes out of business every two hours.  I'm sure that one will if it hasn't already.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,931 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, September 21, 2014 6:35 PM

Norm48327

News reports have indicated their truck maintenance was less than adequate. Not sure of the veracity.

Not just the news reports - the NTSB report highlighted all the failures on the truck involved in the incident.  One would have to conclude that that truck was representative of overall fleet maintenance.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy