Which of the two Interstate corridors I-95 or I-81 could railroads make the most difference (thank traffic reduction)? They both run roughly parallel to each other but carry a somewhat different mix of traffic. I-95 carries a lot of long haul track, a lot of vacationers headed to Florida and business travelers in the northeast. I-81 is by and large a major truck route but is becoming an increasingly popular route (along with I-77 and I-26) for those looking to avoid 95 on the way to Florida.
If Norfolk Southern's actions with the Crescent Corridor lead me to believe the railroads think they can get more business in the 81 corridor.
Modeling the Pennsylvania Railroad in N Scale.
www.prr-nscale.blogspot.com
I'd say both lanes work well for rail. The I-95 might be especially attractive due to the wide imbalance of freight in that lane. There's alot more northbound into NY, NJ, PA and New England than those states export out. Thus rates going north are quite high generally. Shippers are looking for options to bring that cost down, and rail is looking better every day.
The impediment to the I-95 corridor for rail traffic is clearances. The clearances do not permit double stacks on any route. CSX's Gateway project when completed, will permit double stacks from the Norfolk/Portsmouth area to the West via the improved Virginia Avenue Tunnel in DC. That leaves the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore as the bottleneck; additionally the CSX line between Philadelphia & Baltimore is already at maximum capacity for it's present track configuration.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
BaltACDThe impediment to the I-95 corridor for rail traffic is clearances. The clearances do not permit double stacks on any route. CSX's Gateway project when completed, will permit double stacks from the Norfolk/Portsmouth area to the West via the improved Virginia Avenue Tunnel in DC. That leaves the Howard Street Tunnel in Baltimore as the bottleneck; additionally the CSX line between Philadelphia & Baltimore is already at maximum capacity for it's present track configuration.
There's alot of freight that doesn't require additional clearances that could be converted to rail quite easily, without any changes to the infrastructure. Alot of steel moves north from NC and SC presently... most of it goes by truck now.
There is a fair amount of truck traffic on I-81 in and out of Canada (crossing at the Thousand Islands Bridge). In theory, it might be possible to "Auto-Train" some of that traffic (as I believe they do in the "Chunnel"), except that the CSX line that parallels I-81 (St Lawrence Sub) ends at Syracuse, and there's no easy way to continue south.
The Susquehanna parallels I-81 south of Syracuse, but the interchange would be less than graceful, methinks, and the SuzieQ's southward journey ends roughly at Binghampton, where an interchange with CP(?) would be necessary to reach Scranton...
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
CN or CP to Montreal and then Montreal to the US via CSX.
NS's map of the Crescent Corridor shows it to split, and one leg follows I-85 as much as the other leg follows I-81. At the north end it follows CP to Mechanicville.
http://www.nscorp.com/content/nscorp/en/ship-with-norfolk-southern/shipping-options/corridors/crescent-corridor.html
The NS is expecting a very large amount of traffic to go from road to rail when the Crescent Corridor is completed.It will also have traffic from the Heartland Corridor flow into it making it more viable.
I think with the opening of the expanded Panama Canal will be overflowing and this will be the answer that the roads won't be able to handle.
Also the cost effectiveness of transporting on rail rather than truck will be the overall factor for business.
Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."
Ulrich There's alot of freight that doesn't require additional clearances that could be converted to rail quite easily, without any changes to the infrastructure. Alot of steel moves north from NC and SC presently... most of it goes by truck now.
I believe you are correct.
And I also believe that CSX and NS simply do no know about that freight. Market research is a real hole in the boat for the railroads.
I believe NS has laid a major bet on the Crescent Corridor's routes, particularly 'selling' the taking trucks off I-81 in Virginia. Some of the pieces are in place now (some only in the last 2 - 3 years), but my 'outsider' sense is that there's a good 10 years and a few $ Billion of infrastructure improvements to get it to where it will be truly truck-competitive, mainly due to the geography and location challenges noted by others above.
CSX is physically more parallel to I-95, but also has capacity and clearance limitations as also noted above.
In practical terms, for long-haul truck traffic either rail route could be competitive, 'depending'.
For passengers, Amtrak's route over CSX is best. When the "A line" is rebuilt in southern VA / northern NC and a lot of improvements put in place, a huge volume of cars could be taken off I-95 (which is a rolling traffic jam at certain times of the year).
- Paul North.
greyhounds Ulrich There's alot of freight that doesn't require additional clearances that could be converted to rail quite easily, without any changes to the infrastructure. Alot of steel moves north from NC and SC presently... most of it goes by truck now. I believe you are correct. And I also believe that CSX and NS simply do no know about that freight. Market research is a real hole in the boat for the railroads.
I believe NS has a lot beneficial owner info about truckload freight moving in the corridor. They used it to help size and locate terminals on the corridor - for starters.
The problem with the route is it's still a bit too slow and consumes too many crews. 980 miles from Harrisburg to Memphis takes 37 hours and 7 crews. 900 miles NJ to Chicago takes 27 hours and 4 crews. There is some work to do, still.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
I have always found it amazing that the I-81 corridor was never a major rail route. How much rail traffic was carried and interchanged through Hagerstown by N&W and the Pennsylvania anyway?
When the US highways were established in 1926 US 11 ran from upstate New York to New Orleans. Most US highways run either north and south or east and west not diagonally. Interstate 81 parallels US 11 from Harrisburg to Knoxville. Even before World War II US 11 was an important trucking corridor and became much more important since World War II. Today it is one of the most important trucking corridors in the United States. Why didn't Southern and N&W exploit this after World War II? The trucking industry sure did!
aricatHow much rail traffic was carried and interchanged through Hagerstown by N&W and the Pennsylvania anyway?
Not much. North-south traffic moved through Pot Yard back in that era - lots of it.
April 1,1976 and Jan 4, 1987 changed all that.
oltmanndaricatHow much rail traffic was carried and interchanged through Hagerstown by N&W and the Pennsylvania anyway? Not much. North-south traffic moved through Pot Yard back in that era - lots of it. April 1,1976 and Jan 4, 1987 changed all that.
Trucks rates (going north along I95 especially) have really shot up over the last eight to 12 months. Shippers must be looking for alternatives.. they just have to be. What's really nice about that lane too is that very few expect overnight service... in fact most of the people I deal with don't want immediate delivery. That's great for rail because one week or even two week transit times wouldn't be that much of a big deal. I work with about 30 receivers north of Baltimore along I95. When I get service failures its almost always for delivering too soon. This is probably because inventory space is at a premium in the Northeast. Receivers put their orders in well in advance, but as much as possible they try to have their suppliers in the South store the material until it is needed. Here again, the rails could provide a valuable service by moving the material out of the south and maintaining it in transit until the receiver needs it.
Many of us in the trucking industry are short sighted: we see these high rates as only a good thing. I don't see it that way. High rates always invite change and competition. This is a huge opportunity for rail to make significant inroads.
For a trucker headed from Miami to Boston, I could see advantages to either route. I-95 is shorter distance-wise. However, it's congested, passes through major cities and, north of DC has many tolls. Going north, a trucker would have to pay $24 for the Fort McHenry Tunnel, then $60 for the JFK Highway, $30 for the Delaware Memorial Bridge, $26 for the Jersey Turnpike, $65 for the George Washington Bridge and $9.26 for the New England Thruway.
While take I-95 to I-26 to I-77 to I-81 to I-84 to the Mass Pike is a longer distance, it avoids DC, Baltimore and NYC. The only tolls encountered would be the Newburg - Beacon Bridge and the Mass Pike. In terms of rates, it would probably be a wash between the two as whatever is saved on tolls would be spent on fuel.
Ulrich Trucks rates (going north along I95 especially) have really shot up over the last eight to 12 months. Shippers must be looking for alternatives.. they just have to be. What's really nice about that lane too is that very few expect overnight service... in fact most of the people I deal with don't want immediate delivery. That's great for rail because one week or even two week transit times wouldn't be that much of a big deal. I work with about 30 receivers north of Baltimore along I95. When I get service failures its almost always for delivering too soon. This is probably because inventory space is at a premium in the Northeast. Receivers put their orders in well in advance, but as much as possible they try to have their suppliers in the South store the material until it is needed. Here again, the rails could provide a valuable service by moving the material out of the south and maintaining it in transit until the receiver needs it. Many of us in the trucking industry are short sighted: we see these high rates as only a good thing. I don't see it that way. High rates always invite change and competition. This is a huge opportunity for rail to make significant inroads.
Given all that you see, one would think there could be a lot of freight that the rails could pick up, business that pays well, too.
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
There used to be plenty of north-south traffic. It flowed through Pot Yard. The PRR got the short end of the revenue stick, but didn't care. The southern roads needed it. The PRR didn't.
Conrail occurred. The cost to move traffic on the NEC went up. Conrail used the NEC as little as possible. Conrail "demarketed" as much N-S traffic as possible. They moved most of the remaining traffic over to Hagerstown. NS had the weedy, seedy low capacity N&W route toward Roanoke and the unsignalled "S" line branch to Manassas. It was good enough.
There was a push to improve capacity on the Hagerstown route. Conrail installed CTC on their part and raised speeds from 25 to 40. A couple intermodal trains got started. After the NS merger, the S line got CTC, the N&W to Roanoke was improved some, too. The ex-Conrail part got another speed bump, too.
The Crescent Corridor in part restores the capacity that used to exist through Pot Yard.
There's plenty of traffic to go get, and a plan to go get it!
oltmannd There used to be plenty of north-south traffic. It flowed through Pot Yard. The PRR got the short end of the revenue stick, but didn't care. The southern roads needed it. The PRR didn't. Conrail occurred. The cost to move traffic on the NEC went up. Conrail used the NEC as little as possible. Conrail "demarketed" as much N-S traffic as possible. They moved most of the remaining traffic over to Hagerstown. NS had the weedy, seedy low capacity N&W route toward Roanoke and the unsignalled "S" line branch to Manassas. It was good enough. There was a push to improve capacity on the Hagerstown route. Conrail installed CTC on their part and raised speeds from 25 to 40. A couple intermodal trains got started. After the NS merger, the S line got CTC, the N&W to Roanoke was improved some, too. The ex-Conrail part got another speed bump, too. The Crescent Corridor in part restores the capacity that used to exist through Pot Yard. There's plenty of traffic to go get, and a plan to go get it!
ConRail routed their 'Pot Yard' traffic over the B&O after Amtrak got the NEC and basically prohibited through freight traffic on the NEC. Once CSX was formed as a operating entity, the need for Pot Yard ended and it was closed and turned into real estate.
More info on the NS Crescent Corridor Route, which I didn't have time to find early this morning:
Limited article, just an overview: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crescent_Corridor
AAR's webpage on it, though with even less content: http://freightrailworks.org/partners/crescent-corridor/
NS used to have a dedicated website called "The Future Needs Us" ("TheFutureNeedsUs.com") as the vehicle for its public-private partnership PR effort, but it seems to be "Not Available" lately. However, here's a link to a remnant, an 8-page brochure from 2009 (approx. 5 MB electronic file size) - note the state-by-state breakdown on page 6 of 8, and the "horse-p-p-power" on the front cover:
http://www.thefutureneedsus.com/images/uploads/crescent-corridor-brochure_1.pdf
When railroads are consolidating and just upgrading from 1930's standards to the modern age, and even more are barely surviving, there is little time or motivation for improvements and innovations. Meanwhile, European and Australian railroads haul everything, everywhere, using smaller containers and easy on/easy off loading/unloading systems so only small local trucks are needed to take a container to a shipper or destination merchant. In Britain, most "goods trains" run at night, making room for the heavy passenger traffic each day. Much of our single track county could double-tracked to substantially reduce wait time "in the hole" for both freights and passenger trains. And we overlook consistently the full trains handling millions of inter-city commuters each day around our major employment hubs. Reconnect some of the short haul inter-city services with high speed rail and enormous relief to car traffic will be possible.
BaltACD oltmannd There used to be plenty of north-south traffic. It flowed through Pot Yard. The PRR got the short end of the revenue stick, but didn't care. The southern roads needed it. The PRR didn't. Conrail occurred. The cost to move traffic on the NEC went up. Conrail used the NEC as little as possible. Conrail "demarketed" as much N-S traffic as possible. They moved most of the remaining traffic over to Hagerstown. NS had the weedy, seedy low capacity N&W route toward Roanoke and the unsignalled "S" line branch to Manassas. It was good enough. There was a push to improve capacity on the Hagerstown route. Conrail installed CTC on their part and raised speeds from 25 to 40. A couple intermodal trains got started. After the NS merger, the S line got CTC, the N&W to Roanoke was improved some, too. The ex-Conrail part got another speed bump, too. The Crescent Corridor in part restores the capacity that used to exist through Pot Yard. There's plenty of traffic to go get, and a plan to go get it! ConRail routed their 'Pot Yard' traffic over the B&O after Amtrak got the NEC and basically prohibited through freight traffic on the NEC. Once CSX was formed as a operating entity, the need for Pot Yard ended and it was closed and turned into real estate.
Conrail got a couple slots a day. I believe the OJT and a daily pair of Merch trains. TV175/176 had been going that way for a while.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.