Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Railroad concern for crossing safety
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<br />The "problem" with grade crossings in this country seems to be the mentality supported by "Operation Lifesaver" that the driver is ALWAYS at fault. What about the overwhelming amount of knowledge that the railroad has in regards to sight distance, percieved speed of train, etc. and yet refuses to act on it because it will effect the precious bottom line. That is a pathetic excuse for the loss of human life. I know there are people out there that try to beat the train, but what about the ones that are not trying to beat the train but are at a distinct disadvantage not only in knowledge but also in the actual mechanics of the crossing not being adequate to determine if it is safe to cross? Please open your eyes and consider the complete story, not just this facade that "Operation Lifesaver" puts on. In a perfect world stop/look/listen would be ideal, but why discount all the available knowledge and ability the railroad has to PREVENT unreasonable risks at crossing? Thank you for your comments
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy