Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Head-on collision on UP's Golden State Route
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Bucyrus"]</p> <p> <blockquote> <div><img src="/TRCCS/Themes/trc/images/icon-quote.gif" /> <strong>Murray:</strong></div> <div>Bucyrus, I wouild submit that you are overusing the term "assumption" far too much in your argument.</div> <p>The NTSB made a conclusion, based on the facts of their investigation and their analysis of the accident scene.</p> </blockquote> </p> <p><span style="font-family:verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size:small;">Yes, they made a conclusion based on the facts. But their conclusion was an <span style="text-decoration: underline;">assumption</span>. And that's a fact. </span></span></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p>I disagree.</p> <p>A conclusion based upon the facts of an official investigation is not and cannot be an assumption. It is just that...a CONCLUSION.</p> <p> If that were not the case, then what is the point of official investigations and analysis of accidents?</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy