Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Grade Crossing Protection Insight
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The report linked to the first post deals with the pursuit of a sealed corridor.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And while it recognizes that a sealed corridor cannot include today’s grade crossings, it pursues the question of whether crossings can be made inviolable so they can be included in a sealed corridor.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So the report is unusual in its deep exploration of the driver attitudes and beliefs that are commonly associated with crashes.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">It makes sense to learn as much about the crossing violator profile as possible.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If you are going to build a mousetrap, you need to learn what mice think.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>One thing they think is that cheese tastes good.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Another thing they believe is that the presence of a mousetrap is irrelevant to the safety of mice.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If mice quickly learned that mousetraps were deadly, mousetraps would not work.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Here is an example of this type of intelligence gathering on drivers, and the fine-tuning of crossing protection in reaction to that insight:</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Surveys have shown that most drivers do not realize that the grade crossing crossbuck means yield.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Most drivers simply believe that a crossbuck only marks the location of a grade crossing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>As a result of this finding, authorities are adding YIELD signs to all “passive” (non-signalized) crossings.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Logically, there is absolutely no need for the yield signs because the crossbuck means yield by its legal definition.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But most drivers do not know that, so authorities have concluded that passive crossings are largely unprotected in a practical sense.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">So what we will have, in effect, are crossings protected by two “yield” signs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>One drivers will understand, and one they won’t. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">However, I would say that the authorities have drawn the wrong conclusion in this case.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Drivers may not know that a crossbuck means yield, but they do know that a crossbuck means trains cross.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And most people realize that trains don’t stop for vehicle traffic.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So they understand what is required even if they don’t know that the crossbuck literally means yield.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So I would conclude that the authorities have decided to install a whole bunch of new yield signs to address a distinction without a difference.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy