Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Keystone XL Pipeline vs. Tank Car
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">You may be right, but I am not convinced that the thinning at the source is necessary to separate the sand. Nor am I convinced that the receiving refineries require a thinned product, or could not be easly modified to handle product that is not thinned. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The only clear references to thinning that I have seen say that the need for thinning is to make the oil flowable for pushing it through a pipeline. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">So I am speculating that a whole different handling concept might be developed for rail that would eliminate the need to thin the oil for shipping. </span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy