Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
1974 Wreck of Penn Central Train OV-8
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Paul,</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Yes, as Jeff has mentioned, and as BaltACD has confirmed, having the signal being taken away is a moot point in that it did not actually happen in the wreck of OV-8.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I did not mean to derail this thread by implying that a signal being taken away played any roll in this accident. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">I only mentioned the possibility of signals being taken away in order to make a finer point about the fundamental reason why signals have to be watched continuously if they are clear.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I am only trying to distinguish the degree of distraction from the lapse of attention because it is common to associate a distraction with a momentary lapse of attention.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In the case of this wreck, the distraction was quite prolonged, as opposed to being momentary.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">In this case, the home signal was not clear, but the crew must have assumed it was clear if they were conscious and under the influence of the operator’s message.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So even if a remark from the operator caused the crew to have a lapse of attention, that lapse needed to be at least two minutes long.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That was the time required for the crew to watch the home signal if they believed it was clear.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Regarding the issue of having no warning if a clear home signal is taken away:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When a train approaches an interlocking with the route lined for it, it is possible to drop a red board in the engineer’s face.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If that happens, the engineer may not be able to stop for the signal or even for the conflicting route, but he must make every effort to do so.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Whether that would require stopping as quickly as possible, I am not sure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Perhaps it does because I suppose one way a route could be taken away from an approaching train would be for a conflicting train to run its red home signal and enter a conflicting route.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So dynamiting the train that lost the route might prevent a collision if a conflicting train has run its stop signal.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Not only might the operator accidentally drop a red board against an approaching train after having lined up the route, but also some extenuating circumstance may compel the operator to do it intentionally.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And then there is always the possibility of a broken rail or other type of signal fault that can take the route away from a train on approach.</span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy