Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Keystone XL Pipeline vs. Tank Car
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="WilliamKiesel"]</p> <p>I recently ran across a study comparing modes as to BTU's required to move a ton of freight. I was surprised to learn that pipelines used slightly less BTU's than rail. </p> <p>So, why dig and build a pipeline when adequate railroad capacity exists?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">As others have mentioned, there is more to the cost of moving oil than just the energy needed to move it. You have to compare the entire infrastructure cost and also the labor cost for both modes of transport. </span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">There may indeed be some degree of spill containment advantage to rail transport. But in the big picture, objection to the pipeline is larger than just the worry about the potential for direct environmental damage such as spills. It is a deeper, philosophical objection to the use of the oil. So I am not convinced that our regulators would give an automatic green light to moving the oil by rail, even if it did prove to be a cost effective option. </span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy