Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
new purposed Illinois law
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Yes, the situation I was describing would have a train standing short of a pedestrian crossing, but close enough to have activated the warning signals.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When I say they are activated for no reason, I mean their activation serves no purpose.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But worse than that, the activation by the standing train amounts to a false alarm, and if another through train approaches, the false alarm of the standing train will become a true alarm with no perceptible indication of the change.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is a major danger.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">That danger is the reason behind the “Second train coming” warning that they have recently developed.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That is basically a second alarm in addition to the false alarm of the standing train.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>That second alarm, which is a true alarm, enables pedestrians to distinguish the true alarm from the false alarm.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The first thing that occurred to me would be to simply not give false alarms.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You could accomplish that by a switching system whereby a stopped train could shut off its contribution to the alarm activation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I don’t know how you would accomplish that switch, but there must be many possible ways to do it.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">However, the danger of a false alarm from a train standing on one of multiple tracks is not much different than the danger of a real alarm being triggered simultaneously by more than one approaching train.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So, overall, the “Second train coming” warning is probably the best remedy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Although, even with the “Second train coming” warning applied to a crossing, eliminating the false alarms of a standing train would add safety.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This is because it would leave the “Second train coming” warning to address only the real dangers of multiple approaching trains, rather than including the false alarm for standing trains. </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The situation with road grade crossings is a little different than with pedestrian crossings at stations.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Road grade crossings are either open or closed to through traffic on the road.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Station crossings can be closed to pedestrians by the very train that a pedestrian needs to board, and that closure can prevent them from boarding.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This problem is the heart of the proposed Illinois law, and it does indeed seem like a problem that needs fixing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The only question is whether the proposed law is the best fix.</span></span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy