Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Tar Sands oil pipeline update
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Mookie"]</p> <p>Lotsa acreage in Nebraska - why right over two very important parts of the US? </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Yes, that is a good question.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Why route a pipeline through places where convincing objections will be raised?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I would have thought this issue would have been raised before the routing was even committed.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Would it have been that hard to go around the sensitive area in a way that the opponents would accept?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>What do the proponents say when they are challenged about the possibility of the pipeline contaminating the aquifer?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy