Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Is Amtrak Crash Nevada’s Fault?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">In my earlier post on 8/18, I questioned the meaning of the comment given in the opening statement of their preliminary investigation when they said this: </span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">“Investigators have documented that the sight distance on the section of roadway leading up to the grade crossing from the truck driver’s direction of travel was over 1 mile.”</span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">In response to that comment, I said that I was not convinced that they meant that a driver could see the flashing lights from over a mile away and around a 30-degree curve.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I said that they might have simply meant that there was an unobstructed view of the crossing from over a mile.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If there is no obstruction between the viewer and the crossing, you could call that an unobstructed view of the crossing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But the pertinent point is whether or not you can see the flashing lights.</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Now, in listening to the language in their video, I find that it precisely confirms the elements of my suspicion about what they were saying and what it meant.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In the video, the narrator says this:</span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">“As far as the visibility of the tracks as a truck would have approached from the south, there is no obstructions in that visibility, and the crossing should have been visible from well over a mile.”</span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">If I were investigating this, I would have set the crossing signals to flash on a clear day around noon, and drove south on the highway to the point where the flashing lights were no longer visible.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>And then I would have announced how many feet from the crossing I was when the flashing lights became completely invisible.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Unlike the NTSB, I would not have couched my findings in whether or not obstructions to visibility existed, or used the phrase, “crossing <i>should</i> have been visible.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I would not have spoken of “visibility of the <i>tracks</i>,” whatever that is supposed to mean.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>They don’t even define what they mean by “crossing” in the phrase, “<i>crossing</i> should have been visible.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Crossing can mean the location where the tracks cross the highway, or it can mean the un-activated signals, signal tower, and signal bungalow, or it can mean the red flashing lights of the activated signals.</span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy