Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Rear end collisions
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">I am having a hard time following the thrust of this thread.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I thought that railroaders were nearly unanimous in their belief that crew fatigue was a big problem.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But now I am told that if you say the problem might have a solution because a foreign railroad has no fatigue problem, professional U.S. railroaders will think you are calling them stupid for not solving their fatigue problem.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>So the conclusion seems to be that U.S. fatigue is a big problem, but solution is beyond anyone’s control.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Otherwise they would have solved the problem. </span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy