Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
This is Very Bad
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">This latest news that the crossing was intentionally “deactivated” by the railroad company just blows me away.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You cannot simply shut off or deactivate a signalized crossing and expect drivers to treat it as a non-signalized or so-called passive crossing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Drivers naturally rely on the lights and gates to warn them of approaching trains, so they pay less attention than if there were no lights and gates.</span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Therefore it follows that if the lights and gates fail to activate, you have a crossing situation that is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">far more dangerous</span> than a crossing only having unlighted crossbucks.</span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Maybe the railroad company thought they could make up for the missing safety factor by flagging the crossing for trains.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>However, they proved that the hyper hazard of a failed crossing signal system also applies to trains standing on the crossing as well as trains approaching the crossing.</span></span></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">People talk about drivers being morons and idiots on this forum all the time.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The real moron / idiot is the person who decided to de-activate that signalized crossing and just let it go at that.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy