Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
National Defense, Parallel Non Oil Transport=Electrifcation RR's
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">[quote user="WilliamKiesel"]</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> But, to get there, consensus needs to be made as to the fact that a non-oil based transportation system is indeed useful for national defense and economic growth.</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> [/quote]</span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></span></p> <p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">But is that really a fact? I do not believe that a non-oil transportation system is all that necessary. I don't deem it worth the cost. Why do you think it is?</span></span></p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy