Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
The duration of delay and the inconvenience it caused begs the question of why it was allowed to happen.    The assumptions began with the very premise of the thread title.  That is that the complainers were NIMBYS who could not tolerate a little inconvenience that the CN had every right to cause, and no way to prevent.  The assumptions have been that the CN could not have been negligent because long crossing blockages can conceivably be unavoidable.  Maybe that was the case, but it is an assumption.  <o:p></o:p> So those assumptions in defense of CN gives birth to the devil’s advocate role of assuming that CN was negligent for causing a delay that they could have prevented.  So there are two opposing positions to this thread, and both are based on assumption.  Based on the limited information available about the cause of the delay, it you take away all possible assumptions, the entire thread is moot.  It has no foundation whatsoever.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag