Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
BNSF Watcher, <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> I have heard about the belowground alternative as being D.C.  I imagine that this is a really complex issue of electrical transmission with lots of tradeoffs.  It would be interesting to learn more about HVDC power transmission.  <o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> CNW 6000, <o:p></o:p> The actual rights to a corridor is an interesting question, especially when you consider that there is volume of the corridor both below and above the surface plat. <o:p></o:p> My assumption would be that the railroad companies are in the driver’s seat for calling the shots in any offer to split off special rights to utilities to run power lines on those rail corridors.  However, this idea has “public good” written all over it.  Private railroad companies may therefore feel an unusual pressure to acquiesce to the addition of power lines to their corridors.  I should think that private railroad companies would feel rather defensive about the possibility of their corridors being commandeered for the public good.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag