Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="tbdanny"] [quote user="tree68"]Sad to say, and subject to case law and Florida's application of the principle, lawyers may have some success with the <A title=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractive_nuisance_doctrine href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractive_nuisance_doctrine" target=_blank mce_href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractive_nuisance_doctrine">attractive nuisance doctrine</A>.[/quote] While I see that conditions 1, 2 and 4 are met, and maybe 3, I think that the railroad has taken reasonable care to prevent trespassing.  There's no walkway, so there's obviously no gate that needs to be locked - the only access onto the bridge is via the tracks themselves.  There were 'no tresspassing' signs up.  Short of putting a gate across the tracks (similar to some British transition-era private industry sidings), what else could they have done? [/quote]   They could have placed decking and a railing on the unused second track structure.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag