Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Fast Track To Public Rail Electrification
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P mce_keep="true">[quote user="jclass"] <P>Why would electrification and HSR be seriously considered to be part of the new purpose (other than for use as a political bargaining chip)? I don't see where either would increase political support for those pushing sustainability. Railroads in the general public's perception are a liability.</P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>I am not sure I understand your question.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>What I call the <U>new purpose</U> is basically the new reason to electrify, and that new reason is for the achievement of sustainability.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>In this case, sustainability will be boosted by the use of renewable energy in the form of wind-generated electricity.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The use of renewable energy will accomplish the following two objectives:</FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 36.75pt; TEXT-INDENT: -18.75pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.75pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>1)<FONT size=2><SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"> </SPAN>It will eliminate the use of oil, which will insure against a crisis of oil shock, should foreign sources of oil be interrupted</FONT></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 36.75pt; TEXT-INDENT: -18.75pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list 36.75pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>2)<FONT size=2><SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"> </SPAN>It will eliminate CO2 emissions, which will help avert a climate crisis.</FONT></FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>The previous main reasons or purpose for electrification was as follows:</FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 39.75pt; TEXT-INDENT: -21.75pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list 39.75pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>1)<FONT size=2><SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"> </SPAN>It would lower operating cost.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt 39.75pt; TEXT-INDENT: -21.75pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list 39.75pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>2)<FONT size=2><SPAN style="FONT: 7pt 'Times New Roman'"> </SPAN>It would eliminate smoke during the steam age.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P><FONT face=verdana,geneva> <o:p></o:p></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva>The elimination of smoke during the steam age was an emissions issue similar to the CO2 emissions issue of the <U>new purpose</U>, but the objectives are quite different.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Up until a couple years ago, CO2 had never been considered to be nuisance or hazardous emission, so no previous objective of smoke abatement was based on the desire to eliminate the CO2 component of smoke emissions.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So the two reasons that make up the <U>new purpose</U> for electrification have never been part of the rationale of any previous analysis, proposal, or execution of railroad electrification.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=verdana,geneva></FONT> </P> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><FONT face=verdana,geneva><FONT size=2>Because rail is low friction, it is inherently more energy efficient than either air or highway transportation.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So there is an economic attraction to shifting as much air and highway transportation to rail as possible.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And by shifting that present non-rail transport to rail, it can be powered by renewable electricity instead of oil-based, non-renewable fuels.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So electrified rail is the centerpiece of this sustainable transportation vision, not only for the traditional rail shipments of today, but for future shipments of much of what is today shipped by truck.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Likewise, passengers from air and highway will be diverted to rail and be thus powered by renewable energy.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy