Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
NS and Brookville Equipment building a Battery Electric Locomotive
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino>It will be very interesting to see how this locomotive works out.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I hope we will be quickly informed of the technical details of the locomotive and its performance during testing.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I am somewhat skeptical only because this is publicly funded, and all wrapped up in the green, sustainability movement, which I have observed to contain a lot of symbolism over substance.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino> <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=georgia,palatino size=3>One thing to consider is that it is possible that this new locomotive will usher in a new era of motive power that will actually be more expensive to operate, and therefore drive up the consumer cost of transportation.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It might be the price of sustainability.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Greenness and cost reduction do not necessarily go hand in hand.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Often they are mutually exclusive.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The payoff for greenness and sustainability is in saving the planet from destruction.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If it happens to reduce operating costs from higher efficiency, so much the better, but in many cases sustainability raises the overall cost of a product.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The extra cost is the price of saving the planet.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Furthermore, these green advances are prone to become legally mandated because they otherwise would not be embraced due to the higher cost.</FONT></P><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino> <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=georgia,palatino size=3>If this new locomotive promised to lower the cost of rail transport, I would be amazed if every major railroad and locomotive builder were not investing in it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If it were some exotic new proprietary technology that could reduce costs, I would not be surprised to see it being held by just one developer.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But a battery-powered locomotive is an old concept, so I would be surprised to see it suddenly take off as a locomotive having a lower operating/life-cycle cost.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That could be the case if there were a major breakthrough in battery technology.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>A lot of potential battery power applications are waiting for a better battery.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Perhaps that day will arrive, and the R&D work with the NS 999 will pave the way for a truly cost effective battery locomotive.</FONT></P><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino> <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino>Interestingly, the news of this new locomotive could fit well into our recent thread about the recapture of dynamic brake energy from diesel-electric locomotives.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That indeed seems to be the core of improvement embodied in the NS 999.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And maybe that core, coupled with new technology in the control systems could have solid merit in the pursuit of a more cost effective locomotive.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino> <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face=georgia,palatino size=3>As has been mentioned here and on other forums, the dynamic brake functionality of the NS 999 is liable to be quite different from that of conventional diesel-electrics.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>With the latter, the purpose is to achieve better braking performance.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>With the NS 999, the purpose is to capture as much braking energy as possible.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Moreover, the braking performance objective of conventional dynamic braking would not have much application in yard service.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So the dynamic braking objective with the NS 999 should be to capture as much dynamic brake energy as possible all the way down to dead stop, and this should be the primary braking, unlike conventional dynamic braking. </FONT></P><FONT size=3><FONT face=georgia,palatino> <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT face=georgia,palatino>The problem with this objective is that dynamic braking force falls off as motor speed drops.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Theoretically, dynamic braking could not actually stop the locomotive.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All it can do is slow the locomotive down to some degree.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>From that point, bringing the locomotive to dead stop would need to be accomplished either by rolling resistance or by air brakes.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I don’t know what is needed to maximize the dynamic brake regeneration at the slowest possible travel speeds.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>One way to accomplish this would be to use higher speed motors and gear them down farther.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The point would be to have the motors turning fast enough at say five mph and slower, to generate enough power to act as brakes if that power load were used to charge the batteries.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But I am guessing that NS 999 uses conventional traction motors and gearing, so maybe there is another way to extend the dynamic braking to near stop of the locomotive travel for the objective of recapturing as much energy as possible.</FONT><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></P><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT> <P mce_keep="true"> </P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy