Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie [quote]QUOTE: Originally posted by kevinstheRRman [quote]QUOTE: Originally posted by daveklepper Aren't the parents really the ones at fault here? Dave Klepper [/quote] And I don't agree- The parents can not assume 100% of the blame, once again, we've taken the route of Blamming other people. The boy has to have a minimum age of 126 Granted or even 17 maybe 18, Most likely 18 because that type of project is somehting that is assighned in a senior year. So were going to hold the parents responsible for somehting an 18 year old does? I agree that f the kids are under 18 then the parents should know where their children are at all costs, but blamming the parents entirely? Thats grasping at straws, and if i was on a jury, that wouldn't fly with me. Sure the child displayed Purile behavior, that was dangerous on almost every single level, i agree with that. [/quote] Kevin - in my state, the age of majority is 19. Yes, parents should be responsible until the child is 19. How they collect the $ from him is their decision. Mook [/quote] I still disagree- if a 10 year old can be tried as an adult in cases like murder, then a 16-17 year old can sure as heck be tried as an adult in such a case.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag