Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Moving Nuclear Waste By Rail, Yay or Nay???
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by edblysard</i> <br /><br />Man, not to be a spoil sport, but if John Q Public knew what we already haul around, and through their citys, towns and neighborhoods, they would pull up the rails. <br /> <br />Hydrocyanatic acid, LPG, MDI, chlorine, amonia, acrylic acid, and so many chemicals with tounge twister names that, if it leaks, things die. <br /> <br />Hundreds of thousands of gallons of things that curl you toes when you read the hazmat info on them, yet we move them every single day, millions of miles a year, through towns and cities, safely and without incident.. <br /> <br />Nuclear waste? <br /> <br />Not a problem, wheres the trainsheet and the motors? <br /> <br />Ed <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Yeah, try one day getting really close, and reading what the actaul freight cars contain, Amonium-hydroxide, Potassium Nitrate, Basically any element on the peridoic table AND its compounds.. <br /> <br />Not to mention, C3H8, C3H6, <br /> <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy