Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Why are GE locomotives better than EMD?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
The point that you individuals who say that you are locomotive engineers completely miss is that the railroads do not exist for your benefit. The railroads, like any business, are for the benefit of the customers and the investors. Whether the commodity is hauled by EMD or by GE or by mule is immaterial. What counts is that the material arrives on time. As a customer I can say that if the railroad doesn't deliver, I can very easily have my business sent by truck. And as a customer it does not matter who's locomotive is pulling my freight. <br /> <br />The railroad company investors require a return for the loan of their money. The railroads must get the maximum benifit from the funds they have available. If that means that they purchase locomotives that are not the favorite of the engineers because the economics are more favorable then it is obvious that the "best" locomotive is not the one that is the favorite of the engineers. If the railroads do not maximize the return on investment then the investors will take their money elsewhere, leaving many of you without jobs. And as an investor I have before, and will again remove my money from rail stock and bonds if the returns are not there.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy