Trains.com

Do not hump!

14236 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Do not hump!
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:30 PM
OK, I've been seeing more and more cars with the words "Do Not Hump!" emblazoned on the side of them, than I ever remember before. Some, such as the "waste water" tanker for work crew trains, or the specially configured cars designed to be linked together to carry new rail (which I guess applies if the cars are loaded, mostly) seem rather straight forward, and obvious, but I've been seeing some real puzzles too, such as plain vanilla looking gondolas, and covered hoppers, making me wonder why?

For you seasoned vets, from your experiances, what qualities in either cars, or the loads they carry, constitute definite "no-no" for the hump?
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,146 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 4:02 PM
I think you got it when you said the load they carry. Some cars are in "captive service" going back and forth from the same shipper/consignee pairs all the time. If the load they are always carrying is not shock-proof, it would make sense to label that car.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 4:03 PM
Anybody who loads a car can put a "Do not hump" placard on the car. That doesn't mean we'll abide by it.

What can and cannot be humped is generally determined by the individual railroad, or even by the management at the specific yard. There are some cars, such as the glass-lined tank cars for refrigerated ethylene, that cannot be humped, loaded or empty. There are also regulations (Federal, I believe) about not humping (or kicking) cars in certain categories, depending on the color or design of the placard and the type of car or container on which it's applied.

At my local humping operation, we do not hump flat car loads of large combines, automobiles (wink, wink), or shiftable loads of steel (again, wink). Hazardous loads are given extra time for proper handling. Like Ed said in Mookie's thread about LP gas, we hump these "bombs" all the time, and there's very little to worry about. There are other types of cars, far less hazardous, that I'd rather refrain from humping because of what they can do to a yard or a track.

A lot is up to the individuals doing the work. Just because some of the restrictions on paper are often winked at, it doesn't mean that the cars are handled carelessly. Our track record is pretty good overall, and we do well when compared to other yards (which are supposedly far more sophisticated) on our railroad. And we don't have one poor railroad's record...a couple of weeks ago I heard from a source that should be reliable that General Motors (the number one customer for many railroads) will not give any business to one particular railroad because of damages incurred in its yard(s). Things have supposedly changed on this railroad, but GM has a long memory, and probably won't ship via this line for a long, long time.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 964 posts
Posted by TH&B on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:05 PM
I've seen "DO NOT HUMP" cars go over the hump including open end flat cars with pipe, steel plates and coils with all the coils ending up at one end of the gon and open cars with wheels wich is against the rules. I've also seen cars been delivered with signs saying do not unload this side. I've seen boxcars with paper roles shifted so you can't unload it because it's so jammed you can't get the first role out without destraying it AND the steel boxcar is busting at the seems from the 80 ton load shift. I've seen this in the past year and the boxcars looked old with no cusion draw gear!!

You know what else I even saw???? A loaded OPEN auto bilevel !! twice !!!! I thought they were history.

Many years ago I saw a boxcar filled with windshields.... all smash almost to pulp when the door was opened at the dock !!

Humping, kicking and switcing is a skill, that requires good judgement and practice to do it right... or else...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:31 PM
A lot of the intermodal cars have "Do Not Hump" written on the ends of them, I've been noticing that a lot of them are the new yellow TTX versions that are not supposed to be humped.

Apparently when you start getting the containers double stacked, humping isn't too good an idea. I suppose you could kick it softly and have nothing happen, but you never really know.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:55 PM
Not only is it the type of lading, it also has to do with weight & Length. If it's a small bowl and the retarders are no longer that great, cars have been known to roll out the other end in search of a derail with enough momentum (Speed x Mass) to hit. Short car long car coupling (bypass) and empties going airborne with help from the next load over the hump play into it as well.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:47 PM
If they are something that could be dangerous if hit hard...they will say this, also if they are MOW equipment that may be damaged by hard jolts.

Pump

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:06 PM
I'm pretty sure my ex-wife had a 'do not hump' sign on her during the last days. OOPS! Wrong forum- I meant to post this in the 'ex's that cut you off at the hump' forum! Darn keyboard!
Seriously though, it would take quite a large yard to hump a CWR cut wouldn't it? How many places produce CWR? I've seen only one (on video) and can imagine with the hour of service law and all the CWR used that humping would be required. Or is CWR 'on demand' and transported as needed?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 2:31 AM
I remember an incident involving a flatcar with two 20' containers that was marked DO NOT HUMP when I was working at the nuclear waste processing site. The car was humped and hit hard enough to shift the load in one of the containers enough to break open the doors. I can just imagine the yard crews faces finding a container marked radioactive with the doors broke open.
Fortunately it was a low level shipment and only required a light decon of the flatcar.
Never the less it was an ugly scene with the hazmat crew and the NRC involved. Lots of paperwork.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:59 AM
Anyone ever say railroading wasn't exciting? Wow!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:25 AM
covered hoppers may have do not hump on them . and depending what is in them would tell me if i would do it or not. corn wheat flour not a problem but if it has trichloralisanuric acid in them ( un 2468 ) i would couple at speed only nessesary to make the coupling.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Anywhere there are trains
  • 578 posts
Posted by Train Guy 3 on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:29 PM
Any reason open hoppers would say " DO NOT HUMP ". I forgot the name that was on the hoppers but one end of each car was red.

TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.

  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,015 posts
Posted by RudyRockvilleMD on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:44 PM
The ICC in the past, and probably the FRA now regulate what can and cannot be hump switched. In general anything that is explosively loaded such as rocket motors, missiles, or material which could be dangerous if subjected to excessive shock must be flat switched and at the lowest speed that will allow a coupling to be made.

I was involved in evaluating the shock and vibration resistance of military equipment for many years during my professional career, and among other things, our test programs included shock and vibration tests to simulate transportation. Considering all modes of transportation shock, the railroad's transportation shock environment is the most severe, most likely due to the possibility the shipment might switched by humping. In general our test requirements included shock due to humping unless it was definitely known that the equipment's shipping requirements precluded hump switching.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:56 PM
Trainguy,
Most likely, the hopper with the red end was a aluminum coal car, or a BethGon, the red end designates the rotary coupler end.
You dont hump them or kick them very hard(at least one wink here) because if loaded, the impact can do a lot of damage to the car when the coal slams into the end...or spills over and makes a mess.
This, of course, is not from personal experience, uhhh, I saw someone else do it.

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:52 AM
It would seem, from a layman's perspective, that with more railcar design trends going towards specialized and unit loads that are less tolerable of hump switching that the hump yard would become a liability vice an asset. Bethgons and other aluminum hoppers, spine and well cars, Automax's..etc all not very forgiving of rough handling. Plus, it would seem that the point to point service would eliminate the need to sort as much as in the past.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:27 AM
We've had no problems humping any of the cars you mentioned, Dan (of course, if the Auto-Max cars are loaded, we don't hump them [;)]). Proper loading and load securement is the key.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:46 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CShaveRR

We've had no problems humping any of the cars you mentioned, Dan (of course, if the Auto-Max cars are loaded, we don't hump them [;)]). Proper loading and load securement is the key.


I didn't know that auto racks were humped. I guess I figured they would be handled...more gently I guess. And I'm looking at this from purely an inquistive standpoint. It would seem that stacks wouldn't be 1) because they wouldn't seem to be sorted as often, with the IMs going more point to point, and 2) the second storey being only pinned to the container below it...it would seem like a lot of unneccessary force on the load. And the coal porters and such being aluminum and more of a point to point also. The trend in building it seems is moving towards specialty cars, vice general freight boxcars. I guess I would have thought that hump yards would be on the decline. This is good info. Thanks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 13, 2004 3:52 PM
I was working a hump job years ago. The first job of the morning, we went down into the yard and coupled to a track to switch. The conductor got off the engine and started back, but something was wrong. There was water standing over the rails several cars away, and a low hanging fog over it. But there hadn't been any rain, and the air smelled kind of sweet. He went back just enough to see what it was, and we skeedadled. The last move of the night switcher was to drop a car into that other track. They didn't watch it, and when it hit, it climbed up over the coupler of a dangerous tank. The result was a drawhead buried in the end of a tank of acid. MAN! I've never seen the environmental gestapo jump so fast...they came out of nowhere right now! Needless to say, the night crew got a nasty phone call to disturb their sleep....{It could have been much worse, but the limestone ballast actually neutralized a lot of the acid.} BTW, I think this was before shelf couplers, so when, about 1911?
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Anywhere there are trains
  • 578 posts
Posted by Train Guy 3 on Thursday, May 13, 2004 7:57 PM
edblysard you were right. I saw a load of those hoppers go by today.... red end lettered " Rotary End ".

TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by toyomantrains

I'm pretty sure my ex-wife had a 'do not hump' sign on her during the last days. OOPS! Wrong forum- I meant to post this in the 'ex's that cut you off at the hump' forum! Darn keyboard!
Seriously though, it would take quite a large yard to hump a CWR cut wouldn't it? How many places produce CWR? I've seen only one (on video) and can imagine with the hour of service law and all the CWR used that humping would be required. Or is CWR 'on demand' and transported as needed?



Let me break it to you gently ToyomanTrains....we also gottum Hot Box Detectors and dragging equipment detectors[:-,]....Now PLEASE go wash your mind out with soap and water , then go appologize to the ex.... Savvy - rockhopper?

[V][V][V]
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:44 PM
MC, darn near everything goes over the hump, but a lot gets held in the retarders...or stopped and allowed to drift out (our CROs know which tracks will give them the desired result). The Bethgons still have steel in them where it counts (we often get stragglers that have been set out of their unit trains). Stack cars (loaded ones) are rare, but we still get them...they're not allowed to hit. I wish we didn't get the autos in our shoves, because they take extra time to handle properly, and the loads and empties really eat up the classification space. But that's the business here...and I can pretty well guarantee you'll never see cars handled the way we do it anywhere else (I think we do pretty well, considering).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: US
  • 446 posts
Posted by sooblue on Thursday, May 13, 2004 11:52 PM
Hi Friends,
Quite a few years ago I worked at a manufacturing plant called Moorehead boiler.
My partner and I spent a month building a grain dryer for Cargill that was 75 feet long and weighed about 150 tons. We shipped it stratling two flat cars and on piviots on both ends. It was cylinder shaped and was more like a boiler with 20 six inch flues. The whole thing was acid resistant and abrasive resistant stainless steel. Very pricey. It took two whole days to get it out of the shop and into the two flats. Half a mile away sat the burlington northern hump yard in Columbia hights MN. (northtown yard) It no longer classifies I believe.
We painted on all sides DO NOT HUMP !

Burlington DID.

Four days later we got the flats back and that dryer was kinked right in the middle and IT had a nice HUMP too.

One of the hardest things I had to do was cut apart that stupid thing to try to save as much of it as we could. This type of Stainless doesn't saw, grind or flame cut. I had to air arc it. [banghead]

At the time I hated burlington northern. The pinheads

I'm sure they got a nice bill but I wanted to go KICK BUTT after all the hours of repair work I had to do.

If it says don't hump there has to be a reason.

Sooblue

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Friday, May 14, 2004 12:12 AM
Look directly at the both idiots in both the tower and out pulling pins, anything straddling two flats has to be shoved to the first joint, then a bumper car shoved down to that joint, before you can let anything fall against it, or hump something down on top, much less shoving the hump with the two cars in the first place, it aint like this is rocket science...

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, May 14, 2004 6:13 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by sooblue

Hi Friends,
Quite a few years ago I worked at a manufacturing plant called Moorehead boiler.
My partner and I spent a month building a grain dryer for Cargill that was 75 feet long and weighed about 150 tons. We shipped it stratling two flat cars and on piviots on both ends. It was cylinder shaped and was more like a boiler with 20 six inch flues. The whole thing was acid resistant and abrasive resistant stainless steel. Very pricey. It took two whole days to get it out of the shop and into the two flats. Half a mile away sat the burlington northern hump yard in Columbia hights MN. (northtown yard) It no longer classifies I believe.
We painted on all sides DO NOT HUMP !

Burlington DID.

Four days later we got the flats back and that dryer was kinked right in the middle and IT had a nice HUMP too.

One of the hardest things I had to do was cut apart that stupid thing to try to save as much of it as we could. This type of Stainless doesn't saw, grind or flame cut. I had to air arc it. [banghead]

At the time I hated burlington northern. The pinheads

I'm sure they got a nice bill but I wanted to go KICK BUTT after all the hours of repair work I had to do.

If it says don't hump there has to be a reason.

Sooblue


Hey Sooblue - long time, no hear! Glad to see you are still out there!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Friday, May 14, 2004 8:46 AM
Ed

we make egg shell couplings here ( you know the kind heard 1/2 mile away with the earth quake feel) it was just a little kick.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 14, 2004 2:22 PM
Mostly the only cars I see with a "Do Not Hump" sign is usually a special car that holds something special or passenger cars
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Saturday, May 15, 2004 5:13 AM
Wabash, I've been know to knock the bark off a couple of them myself, but still, a boiler on two flats, uh...Duh!

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: US
  • 446 posts
Posted by sooblue on Saturday, May 15, 2004 10:57 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Wabash, I've been know to knock the bark off a couple of them myself, but still, a boiler on two flats, uh...Duh!

Ed


Hi Ed,
It was amazing how much that steel tube humped up. It had half inch stainless steel walls and all the interior suports and flue sheets. I didn't know that there was that much flex in the couplers.
Sooblue
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: US
  • 446 posts
Posted by sooblue on Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:07 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by sooblue

Hi Friends,


Hey Sooblue - long time, no hear! Glad to see you are still out there!

Mookie


Hi Mookie,
I'm still here
Say! I was just out to Lincoln a few weeks ago. I'll be back later this summer. I can hardly wait to be able to walk through the rose garden and the sunken garden and go out to frontier park. I brought my 7 year old daughter out a few weeks ago and we climbed on the indian at the park. It was a little cold still though.

I love lincoln. just far enough to feel like a major trip and lots to see.
Sooblue
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Sunday, May 16, 2004 11:10 AM
Ed

I understand completly the one i love the most is the guy who was so rough with his train yarding one night that the 3 car loads( auto racks) of new cars had the alarms going off in them. lights and horns.. i had to stop and pull myself together so i could finish my train yarding. talk about noise.. better than any christmas display and this was at night.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy