Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Railroads Should Rebuild Locomotives Than Taking T
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Well, my friend, I too hate to see old engines scrapped. But the main reason that you see these SD-40's etc. being torched, is the way railroads aquire their fleets of motive-power. Railroads lease the locomotives, usually for 15 years, so they don't actually "own them" the big banking companies do. After the lease is up, the equipment is "fully-depreciated", and it is financially advantagious for all parties concerned, to "retire" these units, and lease new ones. Not all retired units meet the scrappers torch though, many are sold-off to "shortlines" and see another decade or so of service. As to your reference to the BN B30-7A's, I have read that some company has bought about 30 of them, to use as portable power-plants. Not sure if this scheme ever took off or not though. But I know what you are saying, I would LOVE if GP-9s still headed-up every hot-shot freight. Nothing like the sound of a "normally-aspirated-567" loading up to get 10,000 tons outta town. We should talk, E-mail me at Buford6126@aol.com <br /> <br /> Todd C.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy