Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Amtrak funding
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Surely the next sentence would clear up the matter: Since most of their household help have chunkers for automobiles, no one in Highland Park wants their household help to drive and park their chunkers in their neighborhoods. <br /> <br />The average Highland Park home lists for over one million dollars. It is not a place where you would see any car of 1977 vintage rusting away....parked in front of any mansion or any mansion's drive way..... <br /> <br />As for government overhead, the increased burden to the states of collecting and counting the federal gasoline tax would be the same as it is for the federal government. <br /> <br />Under your proposal Texas and Hawaii would probably do well, however, some states would not do so well, such as Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota, and North Dakota. I am sure this list is longer, but it is painfully obvious that these 4 large states with very small population would be hurt . Truckers traveling on I-94, I-90, and I-80 might have a dirt road to get to the west coast instead of a paved interstate....
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy