Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Passenger Trains
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Alexander, <br /> <br />Let me kow what you think of this comparison: <br /> <br />If Amtrak were funded using the 'highway model' then beginning back in '70 every passenger ticket would include a 'User Tax' dedicated to raising funds for building and maintaining roadbed. This money would be forwarded to the federal government who would establish minimum criteria for a region to qualify for an 80% matching fund for new construction. If a region met the criteria then a project would be authorized for construction. Then the federal government would send some of the collected tax money back to pay for 80% of the construction cost. Why not all of the tax money? The federal government spent some of it running this new department and reviewing applications for the money. <br /> <br />This is why I think Amtrak should have set aside a portion of their own revenue to build it themselves; no losses due to federal government overhead. But if they won't do it on their own, then the 'highway funding model' could be used for Amtrak and administered by the federal government. This means ticket prices will go up! <br /> <br />Regards - Ed
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy