Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Passenger Trains
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
I agree with Alexander; your argument is well formed. <br /> <br />In my opinion, the correct answer is to: <br />1) Have the Federal government get out of the airline subsidizing business and let them sink or swim on their own. <br />2) Disolve Amtrak. Allow any local government to pick up a piece if they can reach an agreement with Amtrak. I believe the Northeast US should enter into such an agreement with the NEC portion of Amtrak. <br />3) Clear the way or private entities to run passenger trains instead of government entities. If nobody steps in, then thats tough. <br /> <br />Amtrak could not survive politically if they don't appear to serve the whole nation. But the argument that connecting fifteen or so cites puts everyone within two hours of an Amtrak station is only a paper tiger. Why should so many of us have to live more than thirty minutes from a station. What makes two hours drive, or thirty minutes, the magic number? <br /> <br />I honestly think the best solution will be found after the Federal government gets out of the train business. And the solution may be to have none at all. - Ed
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy