Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Was getting rid of "multiple trackage" really justified?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Multiple tracks tend to be expensive to maintain. One of the things that happened to multiple track railroads was the change from ABS to CTC systems. A lot of multiple track was ABS IE all that was there was a signal system to try to keep trains from smacking into each other. </p><p> Also much of that (ABS) was only signaled in the direction of travel. ie the on a 2 track railroad the north track was west bound the south track was east bound. Kind of like a 2 lane road. Having a signal installation also increases costs.</p><p> If you had a railroad that had enough business to have multiple tracks you also unually had a railroad that needed a signal system. When CTC came out it was cheaper to install CTC and change to a single track the railroad. </p><p> I would suspect that CTC installation came with single tracking a lot of double track railroad as I think the ICC would have had to approve all of this.</p><p> One of the biggest advantages to railroads that were single tracked with CTC is it is now easier to put the 2nd track back in as the at least the grading is already done.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy