Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
TRAINS MAG. and Amtrak
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
While I agree that Trains has had a little too much coverage of Amtrak, I find it intersting that everyone is talking about how great it is that they have all their articles on the UP and BNSF. Personally, I feel that these two roads are getting way too much coverage in the magazine. I've always felt that Trains should change it's name to Trains West, because they rarely have a feature article covering anything east of the Mississippi. <br />I have a large collection of Trains dating back to the 40's, and for the most part it was pretty balanced, with some history, some business, some short lines, some locomotives, etc. Now, if you're not one of the big boys, or out in the desert, you're not gonna get covered. <br />There are dozens of short lines and regional railroads in this country, and we never really get to hear about them. <br /> <br />Just my two cents worth. <br />Scott
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy