Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
TRAINS MAG. and Amtrak
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Steve, <br /> <br />Pardon me if I seem obtuse but I am curious which part of what I said you agree with. Do you think I should have to pay for an Amtrak system which doesn't go anywhere I am interested in going? <br /> <br />I would like there to be a national passenger rail system but I don't think I would like to pay my share of what it would cost. When I say 'national' system, I mean that every city and suburb should have fairly uniform access and service. I think this would cost a staggering amount of money. I also don't think a majority of US citizens would be willing to pay their share either. It seems to me that if the system doesn't serve most citizens, it isn't serving as much of a function supporting the nation. In which case, it isn't providing an adequate alternative to the nations transportation needs and not supplementing the nation in case of a disaster. <br /> <br />In this case, I think the people served by the system should bear the costs. I don't understand why it should be any more complicated than that. <br /> <br />Let me know what you think and where we agree. Thanks - Ed
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy