Trains.com

Mook's latest.......

1731 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Mook's latest.......
Posted by Mookie on Monday, February 23, 2004 6:35 AM
Only had a short time - but got to watch some trains. Picked up the following:

I know they run some strange stuff over the railroads, but one I didn't need my book to figure out was a tanker marked Molten Sulpher. That sounds horrible. What do they do with it?

SHPX had suction tubes on a bottom dump. Why? (Driver said they were suction tubes - I just thought they were pipes....)

SD39 and B23-7 brought a short freight into yards. Uncoupled and backed up into throat of yard. Then looked like a Chinese Fired Drill. Both men got off head engine and walked back to 2nd engine and got on. (The SD39 was the rear one and the B23-7 was the head-end at that point - just the opposite of how they came into the yard) Couldn't they just "back up"? It was only two engines. I am sure I am missing something here, but then, that's why I come here for answers.

Miss A Lot Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,146 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Monday, February 23, 2004 6:47 AM
Sulpher, like most elements comes in 3 forms, vapor, solid, or liquid, depending upon the temperature and pressure. Molten is one of the liquid forms (or it wouldn't be in a tank car). I see unit trains of the stuff coming out of Chicago and heading south and east, so I don't know what industry receives it. Sulpher is an additive to steel to make it easier to machine, and I believe it is also added to rubber for tires, yet I see loads going away from those industries[%-)]
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,146 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Monday, February 23, 2004 6:55 AM
The tank car could just be a general purpose car, so it has the capability to (un)load from either the top or bottom, depending upon what equipment the customer has and the liquid being transported.

The fire drill you witnessed was probably due to the fact that the crew was going to go the other way for a while. For safety's sake (and I believe, by law) the crew wants to be in the lead unit to get an unobstructed view of the line (crossings, signals, traspassers, etc.) ahead.

By the way, I was playing around with Train Dispatcher the other day and stumbled upon a Lincoln to Ravenna simulation. How many trains a day do they run on that line? The only way I could keep things moving was to run everything into sidings and then run fleets of 6 or more at a time.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Monday, February 23, 2004 8:15 AM
Mook, I too see molten sulphur cars once in a while here on the BNSF main and lots of other types of hazerdous cargo that really makes me kind of nervous being relatively close to the tracks while railfanning....one wrong move and those of us watching couldn't get out of the way fast enough....bet that made all of you feel just a little bit safer, no joke intended, just be sure you are within a safe distance of the tracks while railfanning and that you can "get out" when you need to in a hurry.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, February 23, 2004 9:13 AM
Hi Mookie,
rrnut had it right, the crew most likely were going to take a train back the way they just came from, or run the motors "light" back home, they would want to be on the lead unit if it was more than a mile or two.

Sulpher, yeck, those cars stink, smells like rotten eggs.
Steel, some fuel, medicines, explosives, gunpowder and rubber are just a few uses for the stuff.
It is loaded hot, in a liquid or "molten" state, when it cools, it hardens, just like the stuff on a match head.
The pipes under the car were most likely steam inlet and outlet pipes, they connect to steam lines that run around the inside of the tank, to let the guys who unload this stuff heat it back up so it melts(becomes molten) and will flow more easily out of the discharge valve.
The tanks are insulated, so this stuff will stay molten for a long time, but if it does cool down, there is no way to get it out of the tank till you reheat it.
And you cant ship it in anything but a tankcar, or it will become contaminated.
If you ground it up into a powder, and shipped it that way, it would absorb moisture from the air.
These cars are used only for sulpher loading, and are marked or labled such.

Cant remember who, but one tankcar lessor painted their fleet of sulpher cars the same shade of gross yellow the sulpher is, I guess to hide the slop over on the sides..
I dont know the exact temp, but the stuff becomes molten at a fairly low temp, under 200f degrees, you could melt it in a pan on your stove, if you could stand the smell and the fumes.

Ed[:D]

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, February 23, 2004 9:48 AM
Some of the sulphur winds up as the smell you get in your gas service. (it doesn't come out of the ground smelling that way)....SD-39? (Santa Fe had 20, BN had zilch....my buddies from Raton Pass are still around withthe SD-26's already long gone??? a slug mother got loose?)
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, February 23, 2004 10:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rrnut282

The tank car could just be a general purpose car, so it has the capability to (un)load from either the top or bottom, depending upon what equipment the customer has and the liquid being transported.

The fire drill you witnessed was probably due to the fact that the crew was going to go the other way for a while. For safety's sake (and I believe, by law) the crew wants to be in the lead unit to get an unobstructed view of the line (crossings, signals, traspassers, etc.) ahead.

By the way, I was playing around with Train Dispatcher the other day and stumbled upon a Lincoln to Ravenna simulation. How many trains a day do they run on that line? The only way I could keep things moving was to run everything into sidings and then run fleets of 6 or more at a time.
I sit at the east end of the yard and they run those Lincoln to Ravenna/Hastings trains out the west end. But they do run a lot. Don't quote me, but I think they run all the coal trains through that line. It is definitely a main line. Saturday they ran about 8 trains out the east side in less than an hour. Only reason I sit on east end is because there is not much place to park on the west end. Maybe someone can help us out with approximate #'s on this.

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, February 23, 2004 11:03 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

Some of the sulphur winds up as the smell you get in your gas service. (it doesn't come out of the ground smelling that way)....SD-39? (Santa Fe had 20, BN had zilch....my buddies from Raton Pass are still around withthe SD-26's already long gone??? a slug mother got loose?)
Maybe a re-painted Santa Fe? I have a list that I printed off that tells me what the engine is by the number. Maybe my list is incorrect? I wrote it down very carefully, but didn't write down the engine #. Will watch for it, since we see that B23-7 or one like it frequently. Will start taking better notes. And if someone has a good website for engine #'s and types with it, let me know.

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,146 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Monday, February 23, 2004 11:43 AM
Miss Mook

8 in an hour sounds about right for the simulation , too. Cool. Somebody was actually familiar with the territory.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, February 23, 2004 11:50 AM
Those SHPX tank cars for sulfur are pretty new.

I'm pretty sure that some agricultural use accounts for the larger volumes that we see here (I've seen a few unit trains on UP, but I suspect that other railroads haul more of those than we do, at least through Chicago). One destination I've seen very often is Hopewell, Virginia, which can apparently be reached via both NS and CSX.

Ed's got the correct answers about the cars theselves, though I should point out that I have seen sulfur transported in open-top cars before. I'm sure that tank cars are the preferred method, though (and it's been a long time since I've seen it in hoppers!).

Carl

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 389 posts
Posted by corwinda on Monday, February 23, 2004 5:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

SHPX had suction tubes on a bottom dump. Why? (Driver said they were suction tubes - I just thought they were pipes....)



That's a covered hopper; right? Somewhat longer than a normal grain hopper?

If so; I've seen the same kind in Springfield OR. I believe they are a modern version of an airslide hopper. (One of the experts can give both of us a better explanation of what they are used for/how they work.)
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • 655 posts
Posted by Mikeygaw on Monday, February 23, 2004 7:25 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Originally posted by mudchicken

And if someone has a good website for engine #'s and types with it, let me know.
Moo

ok,
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/NS.HTML for NS
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/CSX.HTML for CSX
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/BNSF.HTML BNSF
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/UP.HTML for the Borg

those are the sites i use

yes, i know they're in red, i didn't make em, so cant help it
i had another site that was better, but dont know where i shoved the link to
Conrail Forever!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 23, 2004 7:31 PM
The spelling in common U.S. useage today is sulfur.

Most sulfur (86% as of 1992, the last data I have) is used for making sulfuric acid, by far the broadest-use industrial chemical in the world because it's cheap and an extremely powerful acid. Sulfuric acid use is regarded as one of the most accurate indexes of a nation's industrial development.

Principal uses of sulfuric acid are (not in order):

1. steel making, to pickle (clean scale and oxidation) off steel in preparation for rolling, galvanizing, heat-treating, and tinning
2. oil refining, as an organic reagent to reform hydrocarbons and to dissolve impurities
3. fertilizer making, to treat phosphate rock to form phosphoric acid, superphosphate, and triple superphosphate (this is the largest use by volume)
4. ore processing, to leach metallic elements from the worthless country rock (principally copper)
5. All manner of chemical processes.
6. Paper-making (sulfide and sulfate papers, such as Kraft paper)
7. And of course, lead-acid batteries.

Sulfur sources include native deposits, principally cap-deposits on salt domes along the Gulf Coast and in co-location with gypsum evaporate basins in Texas, Iraq, Poland, and Russia; sulfide ores of copper, lead, zinc, and silver; sour natural gas, and petroleum sands. Sour natural gas is becoming the biggest North American source, from processing plants in the Western U.S. and Canada.

Charlie, if you smell sulfur in natural gas (it's in the form of hydrogen sulfide, a deadly poison gas) it's because it was inadequately purified, not because it was added. Sulfur in natural gas corrodes pipes terribly, as well as being poisonous, so it's removed. In the past, sour natural gas was avoided by the oil companies, but with the prices and supplies the way they are now, they have bitten the bullet and built processing plants.

By the way, the quantity of hydrogen sulfide in natural gas sold for use in your furnace or stove is very, very small -- it's very easy to detect by smell, however. Out of the ground, a lot of sour natural gas contains enough hydrogen sulfide to kill you very dead almost instantly.

Almost all sulfur shipped for domestic consumption is shipped as a liquid, whereas for export it goes as a solid, loaded in open-top hoppers or coal gondolas. It's shipped as a liquid because it's easy to pump it into and out of tankcars, and because it's easier to work with to make it into acid that way.

In the past, the principal domestic supply of sulfur was from domes along the Gulf Coast mined using the Fraasch process (pumping down steam to melt it, and pumping up the molten sulfur), but today those domes are mostly mined out.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,865 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, February 23, 2004 7:34 PM
That awful smell you associate with natural gas and propane is definitely added - exactly so you will smell it. Hydrogen sulfide notwithstanding, NG and LP have no odor.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:24 AM
Agreed, Mark...it's "sulfur" in the U.S. But check out those tank cars...you'll find a lot of them come from Canada, and are stenciled "sulphur". "Sulphuric Acid" cars are also pretty common in these parts, even though the reporting marks are American.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:00 AM
True enough! I noticed that the other night while a long, long string went by on the former WC.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 5:19 AM
Mookie,

Molten Sulfur used to not be a hazardous material. One day a truck of it had a wreck on the Carquinez Strait bridge between Benecia and Martinez CA. Broke open the flimsy truck tank. The sulfur was hot enough to burn, and it did quite spectacularly. Of course it made a big column of Sulfur Dioxide smoke. Sulfur dioxide is most unpleasant to breathe cause it becomes Suluric Acid in your lungs. Get much and your lungs bleed and you die from pulmonary edema.

The odorant in LPG and pipline gas is methyl mercaptan. Is about a quart of mercaptan in a 30,000 gallon net propane car.

Bureau of Explosives (Retired)
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:45 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mikeygaw

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Originally posted by mudchicken

And if someone has a good website for engine #'s and types with it, let me know.
Moo

ok,
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/NS.HTML for NS
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/CSX.HTML for CSX
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/BNSF.HTML BNSF
http://www.online-isp.com/~rcraig/UP.HTML for the Borg

those are the sites i use

yes, i know they're in red, i didn't make em, so cant help it
i had another site that was better, but dont know where i shoved the link to

Thank you - I will print them off - We do see some NS and CSX thru here, so it will be nice to have some #'s for them.

Poor MIllie will have to go from a small Buick to a station wagon when I get all the paper I have printed off in her to go train watch! RR cops will call me in as an industrial hazard - car filled with paper!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 9:11 AM
I do prefer sulphur to sulfur
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, February 24, 2004 9:31 AM
This thread is an example of what I really like about this forum. So much information from so many educated folks.

Congrats to all the contributors!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy