Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Rail Link to Alaska, Part II
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Is the Alaska Rail Link the most important proposed rail line project in North America? I would think the Lewiston-Missoula Rail Link has more merit, since it only requires the construction of a 100 or so miles of new rail line to connect the West Coast's most inland barge port with the Northern Tier rail grid (e.g. BNSF in Montana), while the Alaska Rail Link would require a 1000 or so miles. At a cost of $5 million per mile, the L & M rail link would cost $500 million, while the Alaska Rail Link would cost $5 billion. In terms of commodities to pay for the respective lines, the L & M Rail Link would be a vital link in the current movement of export grain and heavy haul containers, while the Alaska line would be dependent on the development of on line resource development, a risky venture. It is doubtful the Alaska line would be used for much Pacific Rim export cargo from the Midwest.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy