Trains.com

Hello Washington We've got a problem with the Southwest Chief

664 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Hello Washington We've got a problem with the Southwest Chief
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:42 PM
The Southwest Chief has had Locomotive Problems lately on last Saturdays Train 3 which left Chicago late Engines 16 and 65 failed and were set out in Wyant then they had one Locomotive with 21 Cars to Galesburg and then they added 2 freight Locomotives then the Crews died so they had to get another crew. Then the train had 2 Freight Locomotives to LA then if that wasan't bad enough it gets worse then 4 of the 14 had Locomotive Failers Guess Where right before Raton Pass so the BNSF dispahers told them give a run for it but it keep over heating so they had to go back down and set out the Road Railers then back to train 3 they ran out of gas in the Mojave Desert then Yesterday Locomotive 72 had a leaked fuel injector so it was set out and Again they had to relie on the services of a freight Locomotive. Does this Give GUNN a wake up call and blame WARRINGTON FOR BAD ENGINGS
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,286 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 5:06 PM
Wow
can someone get them some gp-9s please
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 6:30 PM
Maybe Amtrak should pull the train with 5 or 6 F7s.[:)]
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 8:46 PM
...Probably all they need is adequate budget to service the equipment.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 8:51 PM
Buy new E-9's. Reference another "verses" thread that got a bit on the testy side. Put 12-645 with turbos --- 4600 HP. Great sound. Great looks. Never breaks down. Well, not often.
Eric
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 8:59 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Doggy

The Southwest Chief has had Locomotive Problems lately on last Saturdays Train 3 which left Chicago late Engines 16 and 65 failed and were set out in Wyant then they had one Locomotive with 21 Cars to Galesburg and then they added 2 freight Locomotives then the Crews died so they had to get another crew. Then the train had 2 Freight Locomotives to LA then if that wasan't bad enough it gets worse then 4 of the 14 had Locomotive Failers Guess Where right before Raton Pass so the BNSF dispahers told them give a run for it but it keep over heating so they had to go back down and set out the Road Railers then back to train 3 they ran out of gas in the Mojave Desert then Yesterday Locomotive 72 had a leaked fuel injector so it was set out and Again they had to relie on the services of a freight Locomotive. Does this Give GUNN a wake up call and blame WARRINGTON FOR BAD ENGINGS


I saw thw two BNSF units leading the train into LA. It was on Monday the 2nd.
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Memory Lane, on the sunny side of the street.
  • 737 posts
Posted by ironhorseman on Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:52 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Doggy

The Southwest Chief has had Locomotive Problems lately on last Saturdays Train 3 which left Chicago late Engines 16 and 65 failed and were set out in Wyant then they had one Locomotive with 21 Cars to Galesburg and then they added 2 freight Locomotives then the Crews died so they had to get another crew. Then the train had 2 Freight Locomotives to LA then if that wasan't bad enough it gets worse then 4 of the 14 had Locomotive Failers Guess Where right before Raton Pass so the BNSF dispahers told them give a run for it but it keep over heating so they had to go back down and set out the Road Railers then back to train 3 they ran out of gas in the Mojave Desert then Yesterday Locomotive 72 had a leaked fuel injector so it was set out and Again they had to relie on the services of a freight Locomotive. Does this Give GUNN a wake up call and blame WARRINGTON FOR BAD ENGINGS


Also last week the northbound Chief derailed in Kansas City.

yad sdrawkcab s'ti

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,633 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, February 19, 2004 4:42 PM
Though I like GE's I have to admit that EMD has always, it seems, made better passenger engines. Can't blame GE totally, Amtrak runs bare bones a lot and scheduled loco maintenance is still likely deffered.

I still remember back in the 90s a friend who worked on Amtrak equipment before it was transferred out of Tampa. He told me that Maintenance supervisors would allow F40s to run an additional 5,000 miles past the required oil change point! They were under pressure to keep locomotives running or catch major heat from their bosses ! I remember another F40 parked for a week at Tampa Union station: Fried traction motor! Looks like Amtrak still needs work (and funding) in this area.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, February 19, 2004 7:41 PM
EMD AWLAYS RUNS BETTER
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:58 PM
TRAIN 4 LET CHICAGO LATE AGAIN THIS TIME DUE TO CAR TROUBLES
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Sunday, February 22, 2004 12:25 AM
Gee UP dispatchers are not Amtrak's only problem. Who would have imagined?!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 22, 2004 6:46 PM
We have an administration in Washington that will spend whatever it takes to get to Mars,but won't give Amtrak enough money to get a train across the desert.I don't get it.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Sunday, February 22, 2004 9:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by barbarosa

We have an administration in Washington that will spend whatever it takes to get to Mars,but won't give Amtrak enough money to get a train across the desert.I don't get it.


Because if you've ever had to drive it, you'd realize there's more life on Mars......

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy