Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Empire Builder moved to a more southerly route?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="sklimpel"] <p>They won't move the Builder because it would be dumb. The Builder has the highest ridership of any long distance train in the country and most of that ridership is due to the Highline. We carry more passengers to Minot, ND and Whitefish, MT than from Chicago to Seattle. I know this because I am a conductor out of Saint Cloud, MN. The track is too slow on the southern route, there is too much traffic on the southern route and there is not enough equipment to start one right now. So until more equipment shows up and track speeds get raised, it is moot.</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>As was postulated earlier, most of the boardings along the High Line are probably coming from the I-90/I-94 corridor, e.g. the proposed southern line. If that holds true, then it would be dumb not to move the train closer to where the actual boarders reside. That is, unless we can finally admit that Amtrak is nothing but a glorified welfare program, wherein any resemblence of financial accountability is a moot point.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy