Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The AAR and Mississippi navigation (was: "comedy act....")
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
OK, so let's shut the river down completely (And <em>save</em> all that money! And if we do, what effect will it have on the economy?). Who, exactly, is going to move that <em>15%</em> of the nation's bulk cargo? The railroads are maxed out these days; there's more to move that ever before. Also, the railroads, and the nation, are east - west freight worlds, and the Western Rivers are a north - south freight world. There isn't a lot of rail capacity that <em>paralells</em> the river system to take up that 15% if you kill the river off. In short, the river is a minor threat to rail transport; take a look at your nearest federally built interstate highway for a bigger threat. And, you know, in the long run, rail and water transport will be laughing in comparison to trucking. Fuel will only get more expensive, and who uses the most fuel per ton/mile moved? It isn't rail and water, by a long shot.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy